Editing 1016: Valentine Dilemma
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
− | Both [[Megan]] and [[Cueball]] are agonizing over what to get each other for Valentine's Day. Both of them seem to | + | Both [[Megan]] and [[Cueball]] are agonizing over what to get each other for Valentine's Day. Both of them seem to consider the holiday unnecessary and artificial, but worry that failure to celebrate it might upset their romantic partner. Because they're considering this separately, neither seems to realize that the other has a similar response. This results in both panicking and doing weird things. |
− | + | At the heart of the way they are acting is the {{w|prisoner's dilemma}}. This is a canonical example of a game analyzed in {{w|game theory}}, which shows why two individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interest to do so. Wikipedia has a great example of prisoner's dilemma, which illustrates it very well: | |
− | + | :Two members of a criminal gang are arrested and imprisoned. Each prisoner is in solitary confinement with no means of communicating with the other. The prosecutors lack sufficient evidence to convict the pair on the principal charge, but they have enough to convict both on a lesser charge. Simultaneously, the prosecutors offer each prisoner a bargain. Each prisoner is given the opportunity either to betray the other by testifying that the other committed the crime, or to cooperate with the other by remaining silent. The offer is: | |
− | The title text combines the two dilemma scenarios in an absurd juxtaposition, with the reader ("you") choosing | + | :If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves two years in prison |
+ | :If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve three years in prison (and vice versa) | ||
+ | :If A and B both remain silent, both of them will only serve one year in prison (on the lesser charge). | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this way, both Cueball and Megan are kept separate, each not knowing what the other is going to do for Valentine's Day, in what the comic title terms the Valentine Dilemma. Both do weird things for Valentine's Day, which ends up being the perfect result to the Valentine Dilemma, as both end up with the same level of weirdness and don't go for the grand gesture. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The title text combines the two dilemma scenarios in an absurd juxtaposition, with the reader ("you") choosing from the Valentine's Day gift-no gift dilemma and the other person choosing to betray the reader in an armed-robbery case (which might be why they are testifying against you in the first place). | ||
The Prisoner's Dilemma has been referenced before, in [[696: Strip Games]]. | The Prisoner's Dilemma has been referenced before, in [[696: Strip Games]]. |