Editing 1156: Conditioning
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The end result would be that the local wildlife would approach, and presumably attempt to enter, any car that has that same thumping bass. Drivers, in turn, would cease to turn up their music in order to prevent the groups of animals from chasing after their cars, thus solving the problem of annoyingly loud bass. This behavior modification can itself be seen as a {{w|Operant conditioning|somewhat different form of conditioning}}. | The end result would be that the local wildlife would approach, and presumably attempt to enter, any car that has that same thumping bass. Drivers, in turn, would cease to turn up their music in order to prevent the groups of animals from chasing after their cars, thus solving the problem of annoyingly loud bass. This behavior modification can itself be seen as a {{w|Operant conditioning|somewhat different form of conditioning}}. | ||
− | + | Although this plan may seem far-fetched, a similar scheme was seriously proposed in Britain during the {{w|World War I}} to condition {{w|Gull|seagulls}} to associate a submarine's {{w|periscope}} with food, which would give away the locations of enemy submarines as the gulls flocked to their periscopes being raised. | |
− | + | The title text is a dialogue about using a similar method of conditioning to send animals after the {{w|Pope}}. Why someone would want that to happen is left to the reader's imagination. | |
− | |||
− | |||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== |