Editing 1318: Actually

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
The image shows a sphere, a simple model for the shape of the Earth. Six people stand on its surface, talking about ways to best describe it, starting with a flat surface, the first belief held, and ending with general relativity. As the statements form a circle, the very first statement can lead recursively off the last, as described below.
+
{{Incomplete|The article seems plentiful in detail, but maybe things could get a little better structured.}}
 +
 
 +
The image shows a sphere, a simple model for the shape of the Earth's surface, and six people talking about the best ways to describe it in more simple or more accurate ways. It starts with a flat surface, as believed in the middle ages, and ends up with general relativity, where the entire space is curved.
  
 
The statements in detail:
 
The statements in detail:
  
 
;Actually, measurements suggest it's flat.
 
;Actually, measurements suggest it's flat.
*This statement is located at the top of the sphere in the comic, making it most likely to be read first. Given no other context, it will be interpreted as referring to the Earth; i.e. "The Earth is flat." Early man, without any way to measure, likely assumed our planet's surface was flat.
+
* The picture is designed to have us thinking about a planet (presumably Earth), such that when we read the first speaker's comment, we interpret it as "The Earth is flat", which was the earliest view of the planet. (The speaker does not explicitly state their subject, however, which leads to the comic's punchline.)
 +
* Finally, the first speaker comments again, and we now interpret this as referring not to the planet but to the universe itself - current observations suggest that the balance of matter and energy in the universe is such that the universe is, in fact, the {{w|Shape of the universe}} on the largest scales. (Whether this is coincidence or reflective of underlying laws is currently unknown.)
 +
* The arguments could continue around the circle, now referring to the universe. They aren't generally applicable but going round the circle a second time suggests that some similar truth may apply at the scale of the universe, which in turn is again embedded in something else (a kind of meta-universe). The circular layout of the comics invites to continue without end, a nice example of meta-humor.
 +
* The comic may be a reference to "[http://chem.tufts.edu/answersinscience/relativityofwrong.htm The Relativity of Wrong]," an essay by Isaac Asimov which uses the Earth's shape as a central example of the role of models in science.
 +
 
 
;Actually, it's a sphere.
 
;Actually, it's a sphere.
*Many experiments over the ages have proven the planet to be round. These early scientists described their findings as the Earth being a "sphere."
+
* The second speaker explains that the Earth is actually a sphere, tracking the progression of knowledge of the Earth's shape.
 +
 
 
;Actually, it's an oblate spheroid.
 
;Actually, it's an oblate spheroid.
*This clarifies the previous statement; an {{w|oblate spheroid}} has a wider radius at the equator than through the poles. This distinction would have been difficult to notice before the modern age with more precise instruments and the proliferation of airplane travel. On Earth, this occurs because a rotating body tends to bulge at the equator, where the matter experiences greater centrifugal forces (analogous to experiencing more force at the outside of a round-a-bout rather than at the center). This is known as the {{w|equatorial bulge}}.
+
* The third speaker provides further detail on the shape, that rather than being spherical, the Earth is actually an {{w|oblate spheroid}}. On Earth, this occurs because a rotating body tends to bulge at the equator (where the matter experiences greater centrifugal forces - analogous to experiencing more force at the outside of a round-a-bout rather than at the centre), and is known as the {{w|equatorial bulge}}.
;Actually, it's a shape defined by the EGM96 coefficients.
+
 
*This adds even more clarification to the previous statement; the {{w|EGM96|Earth Gravitational Model 1996}} is a detailed map of the Earth's gravitational field, which is not as uniform as a pure oblate spheroid would suggest.
+
;Actually, it's a sphere defined by the EGM96 coefficients.
 +
* A more accurate description is the {{w|EGM96|Earth Gravitational Model 1996}} which provided a detailed map of Earth's gravitational field. This therefore refines the oblate spheroid model even further.
 +
 
 
;Actually, it's that plus local topography.
 
;Actually, it's that plus local topography.
*This adds an almost unnecessary level of clarification to the previous; obviously the Earth's surface is not a smooth shape but rather contains numerous mountains, hills, valleys, etc. which constitute "local topography".
+
* The next speaker notes that this is still a very high level model of the planet (necessary because of the sizes involved) and that the true shape of the planet is given by the actual local topography (i.e., mountains, hills, valleys, etc.) which can be thought as overlaid on the planet wide models.
 +
 
 
;Actually, it's embedded in a universe that's curved.
 
;Actually, it's embedded in a universe that's curved.
* This shifts the perspective from the actual shape of the Earth to the "shape" of the space around it. According to {{w|General relativity}}, our planet's gravity bends the space-time around it, making it curved. At the time General relativity was discovered, it was not conclusively known whether the {{w|Shape of the universe|whole universe was flat or curved}}.
+
* Changing tack, the remaining speaker notes that our planet sits in a {{w|General relativity|curved space-time}}, where our planet's gravity, as well as all other objects, bends the space and time around them. On the largest scale, this has the potential to lead to a {{w|Shape of the universe|curvature}} of the four dimensional space-time of the universe, hence "universe that is curved". Such a universe can either be "open" or "closed", depending on how much mass and energy there is. In a "closed" universe, if you drew a large enough triangle in space, you would find that the angles did add up to more than 180 degrees (just like if it was drawn on the surface of a balloon - in this case, the angles would add up to more than 180 degrees). An example of closed geometry is spherical geometry, where the sum of the angles of a triangle is π < A + B + C < 3π in {{w|spherical trigonometry}}. In an "open" universe, the sum of the angles would be less than 180 degrees.
;Actually, measurements suggest it's flat.
+
 
*Looping around to the first statement and given the context from the previous one, this can now be interpreted as "the universe is flat" rather than "the Earth is flat". Recent measurements of the universe's shape strongly suggest that it is more or less completely flat rather than curved.
+
The pun of the title text lies in the ambiguity of the last sentence. "Eventually, you'll defeat all conversational opponents and stand alone" can literally be interpreted as 'winning' all the debates and standing alone as a sole champion, which would seem to be a flattering thing, but the other interpretation, arguably more likely to occur, suggests that the speaker is going to drive away all conversational partners by being an insufferable nitpicker and end up alone, with no-one wanting to speak to them.
*This could also refer to Thomas Friedman's 2005 book "The World is Flat" which discusses globalization and the idea of the world as a level playing field of equal opportunity for commerce.
 
;Actually...
 
*The next two statements could also be interpreted as referring to the universe rather than the Earth - but they would no longer continue to be more precise than the previous ([[Cueball]]'s) statement.
 
*The text will not continue on to form a ''recursive loop'' - as the statement about the EGM by [[Megan]] would no longer make sense in context of the universe - and the same would be true for the next two statements.
 
;Title text
 
The title text pulls the whole comic together, pointing out that each statement in the comic is more precise than the previous. Unlike the loop in the comic, someone who does this will likely eventually win any real-life debate. The victory will not necessarily be a result of actually proving your logical argument, however: the phrase "stand alone" refers to driving away all conversation, resulting in no one wanting to speak to the person.
 
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
Line 39: Line 43:
 
::Ponytail: '''''Actually,''''' it's a sphere.
 
::Ponytail: '''''Actually,''''' it's a sphere.
 
::White Hat: '''''Actually,''''' it's an oblate spheroid.
 
::White Hat: '''''Actually,''''' it's an oblate spheroid.
::Megan: '''''Actually,''''' it's a shape defined by the EGM96 coefficients.
+
::Megan: '''''Actually,''''' it's a sphere defined by the EGM96 coefficients.
 
::Hairy 1: '''''Actually,''''' it's that plus local topography.
 
::Hairy 1: '''''Actually,''''' it's that plus local topography.
 
::Hairy 2: '''''Actually,''''' it's embedded in a universe that's curved.
 
::Hairy 2: '''''Actually,''''' it's embedded in a universe that's curved.
Line 49: Line 53:
 
[[Category:Comics featuring White Hat]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring White Hat]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]
[[Category:Physics]]
 
[[Category:Language]]
 
[[Category:Protip]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)