Editing 1497: New Products
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| title = New Products | | title = New Products | ||
| image = new products.png | | image = new products.png | ||
− | | titletext = If you ever hear | + | | titletext = If you ever hear "Wait, is that Kim Dotcom's new project? I'm really excited about it and already signed up, although I'm a little nervous about whether everyone should hand over control of their medical...", it's time to dig a bunker in your backyard. |
}} | }} | ||
− | ==Explanation== | + | |
− | This comic points out an apparent paradox in product performance: Many products that are [https://www.google.com/search?q=No+wireless+Less+space+than+a+nomad+Lame criticized by techies when first announced] go on to great success, and many that are heavily hyped are total flops. The product in question may be a reference to the | + | == Explanation == |
+ | |||
+ | {{incomplete|First draft.}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | This comic points out an apparent paradox in product performance: Many products that are [https://www.google.com/search?q=No+wireless+Less+space+than+a+nomad+Lame criticized by techies when first announced] go on to great success, and many that are heavily hyped are total flops. The product in question may be a reference to the Apple Watch, which was announced around the time of this comic's release. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
! If they say... | ! If they say... | ||
− | |||
! Explanation | ! Explanation | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|"It doesn't do anything new" | |"It doesn't do anything new" | ||
− | + | |A product that "doesn't do anything new" may still be successful for a variety of reasons. It may in fact do something new that the engineers and programmers are overlooking, or it may simply be a better presentation of an older idea. This latter category is the completion of the life-cycle mentioned later in the comic, those products whose "ideas will show up in something successful." | |
− | |A product that "doesn't do anything new" may still be successful for a variety of reasons. It may in fact do something new that the engineers and programmers are overlooking, or it may simply be a better presentation of an older idea | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |"Why would anyone want that?" | + | |"Why would anyone want that?" |
− | |If engineers and programmers can't figure out why anyone would want a product, | + | |If engineers and programmers can't figure out why anyone would want a product, that may actually be because the applications are highly avant-garde or niche. Although then it would never become a big success! Engineers and programmers themselves may be in a niche that doesn't share the tastes and priorities of non-technical people, and are therefore unable to understand and accurately assess the appeal that a product will have to the masses. |
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |"Really exciting" | + | |"Really exciting" |
− | + | |Products that are "really exciting" to engineers and programmers, so much so that they have already pre-ordered them, may fail to succeed for two reasons. The product could turn out to be "nerd bait," so to speak. The developers promise a cool, groundbreaking new gadget or service, and people get so excited by the idea that they ignore whether or not it's actually feasible. When the developers can't follow through, unsurprisingly, the product flops. The ideas that it proposed, which were so intriguing to the programmers and the developers, will be worth billions once someone can figure out how to realize them. | |
− | + | Alternately, the product could have the features advertised, but other issues can interfere with the success of the product, which engineers prioritize lower than such features in their assessment of a product's quality or utility. These may include bad marketing (the masses don't hear about or "get" how good the product is), an unintuitive design or implementation (which more technical people may be able to "live with", but the general population may not be able or willing), or something as simple as a lack of aesthetics (which decreases appeal for use by owners and may temper the fervor which might otherwise encourage further sales). | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |"I've already | + | |"I've already preordered one" |
− | | | + | | |
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |"Wait, are you talking about <unfamiliar person's name>'s new project?" | + | |"Wait, are you talking about <unfamiliar person's name>'s new project?" |
− | + | |If a product's developer's name is well-known among engineers and programmers, but not among the general public, that's usually not a good sign. Quite likely, the developer is someone who goes a step farther than those in the previous category, not just announcing something cool and exciting they can't follow through on, but doing so ''knowing'' that they can't follow through yet still taking people's money. The state may press criminal charges against them (for fraud or such), or the angry investors may sue to get their money back. | |
− | |If a product's developer's name is well-known among engineers and programmers, but not among the general public, that's usually not a good sign. Quite likely, the developer is someone who goes a step | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |"I would never put <company> in charge of managing my <whatever>" | + | |"I would never put <company> in charge of managing my <whatever>" |
− | + | |If engineers' and programmers' only objection is that they don't like the company behind the product, that's basically a tacit admission that there's nothing else wrong with it. For the average consumer, the perks of a groundbreaking new product outweigh whatever problems they may have with the company behind it. | |
− | |If engineers' and programmers' only objection is that they don't like the company behind the product, that's basically a tacit admission that there's nothing else wrong with it. For the average consumer, the perks of a groundbreaking new product outweigh whatever problems they may have with the company behind it. | ||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | The title text imagines a product that fits into the second, third and fourth categories | + | The title text imagines a product that fits into the second, third, and fourth categories. {{w|Kim Dotcom}} is a controversial entrepreneur and convicted criminal, who fits the mold of someone well-known to programmers and engineers, but perhaps not so much to your average Joe. |
− | + | According to the chart, such a product would according to 2 from above flop, and according to 3 turn out to be a scam. However it will not necessarily end up in control of whatever it wants to control, because as per 2 that would at least have to be another project released several years later. This does not, however, still not sound good, and may even suggest the rise of some sort of malicious overtaking of our society starting when it acquires our medical records. (We would have handed those over of our own free will, in our excitement about this new fancy product.) Thus the suggestion to dig a bunker. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | == Transcript == | |
− | + | :Predicting the success or failure of a new product | |
− | + | :Based on what engineers and programmers are saying about it | |
− | + | :[A two-column table illustrating this. The words "if they say..." and "it means..." are the headers to the two columns; below, they are reprinted before the transciption of each row, for clarity's sake.] | |
− | : | + | ::If they say... |
− | : | + | :::"It doesn't do anything new" |
− | + | :::"Why would anyone want that?" | |
− | :[A two-column table illustrating this. The | + | ::It means... |
− | : | + | :::The product will be a gigantic success. |
− | + | ::If they say... | |
− | + | :::"Really exciting" | |
− | + | :::"I've already preordered one" | |
− | + | ::It means... | |
− | + | :::The product will be a flop. Years later, its ideas will show up in something successful. | |
− | a gigantic success. | + | ::If they say... |
− | + | :::"Wait, are you talking about <unfamiliar person's name>'s new project?" | |
− | + | ::It means... | |
− | + | :::The product could be a scam and may result in arrests or lawsuits. | |
− | + | ::If they say... | |
− | + | :::"I would never put <company> in charge of managing my <whatever>" | |
− | Years later, its ideas will | + | ::It means... |
− | show up in something successful. | + | :::Within five years, they will. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <unfamiliar person's name>'s | ||
− | new project?" | ||
− | |||
− | a scam and may result | ||
− | in arrests or lawsuits. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <company> in charge of | ||
− | managing my <whatever>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ==Trivia== | + | == Trivia == |
− | *There is a | + | * There is a typo on the first upload. "Preorded" should be "preordered". |
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Charts]] | [[Category:Charts]] | ||
− | |||
− |