| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | | title = 2016 Election Map | | | title = 2016 Election Map |
| | | image = 2016_election_map.png | | | image = 2016_election_map.png |
| − | | titletext = I like the idea of cartograms (distorted population maps), but I feel like in practice they often end up being the worst of both worlds—not great for showing geography OR counting people. And on top of that, they have all the problems of a chloro... chorophl... chloropet... map with areas colored in. | + | | titletext = I like the idea of cartograms (distorted population maps), but I feel like in practice they often end up being the worst of both worlds-not great for showing geography OR counting people. And on top of that, they have all the problems of a chloro... chorophl... chloropet... map with areas colored in. |
| | }} | | }} |
| − |
| |
| − | *A [https://xkcd.com/1939/large/ larger version] of this image can be found by clicking the image at xkcd.com - the comic's page can also be accessed by clicking on the comic number above.
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Explanation== | | ==Explanation== |
| − | The United States elects its president not directly by popular vote but by an Electoral College composed of a number of electors, partially proportional to population, from each state. Presently, a "winner-take-all" system is used in most states: the winner of the popular vote in each state receives all of the electoral votes for that state. Though, strictly speaking, the electors are not required to cast their ballots according to this system, many states impose penalties on them if they don't. Technically, the popular vote in each state is to elect a slate of electors who in turn elect the President. Many Republicans tend to claim that Trump had a strong victory, and show maps filled with large, red counties. These maps look even redder than the state maps, so they make it look like Trump won a large nationwide victory. However, as Randall points, out, those maps are misleading, and using them to promote your candidate is a bit disingenuous.
| + | {{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} |
| − | | |
| − | The news media commonly use maps to represent the progress or results of the election. Because of this winner-take-all system, states won by the Democratic candidate are typically portrayed in one color (blue is currently in wide use), and states won by the Republican candidate in another (currently red). In recent years, this distinction has gone far beyond electoral maps, and states are often referred to as "blue" or "red" by their political leaning in many contexts.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Randall seems to be making a point on the shortcomings of both maps, by showing how different the actual vote was from the red and blue choropleth maps. He mentions how strange cartograms look, and by creating this map he hopes that it will convey the actual vote by geography well, while keeping the normal geographic boundaries.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The title text repeatedly attempts and fails to spell the term {{w|choropleth map}}, a map that uses shading or colors to show information about a geographic area. A choropleth map for elections has many shortcomings. For example, many large Western states have small populations and thus don't make much difference to the electoral vote count, but look like a broad swath of red or blue on the map. The map overall can have the appearance of being very red or very blue, suggesting to the eye an overwhelming victory, when in fact the election may be extremely close. Donald Trump has [http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/04/heres-the-electoral-map-president-trump-gave-reporters.html repeatedly] [https://twitter.com/TreyYingst/status/862669407868391424/photo/1 emphasized] how red the map appears, especially when broken down by county, even though he actually lost the popular vote. In a speech on June 21, 2017, he said, "And those maps, those electoral maps, they were all red. Beautiful red."
| |
| | | | |
| − | In this cartoon, [[Randall]] seems to be pointing out the shortcomings of the choropleth map (or perhaps this overall red-state/blue-state mentality). His map shows more clearly the small impact of the low-population states, as well as how combination of the winner-take-all system with the typical election maps fails to show the sometimes large number of opposition votes in a given state. This map also combines all third-party or independent candidate into one type of marker (green, likely as the third primary {{w|additive color}} available, but at least in part would represent {{w|Green Party in the United States|the Green Party}}), making it clear that a substantial number of votes went to these candidates.
| + | A {{w|Choropleth map}}, referenced in the title text, is a map that uses shading or colors to show information about a geographic area. Like a 'normal' election map that shows districts/states colored to the party that won them. |
| − | A {{w|cartogram}}, also referenced in the title text, is a map that changes the size, and sometimes shape, of a region based on population or some other metric. Like a choropleth, these maps also have many shortcomings, the most obvious being the distortion required for the maps to work sometimes making it difficult to tell what and where the region actually is. Many versions of cartograms use squares to represent each region, with the size of the square corresponding to the metric measured. Often, it's easier to find specific places on these square maps. | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | A similar map was actually used during the 2016 election [https://ig.ft.com/us-elections/results by the Financial Times] ([https://www.ft.com/content/3685bf9e-a4cc-11e6-8b69-02899e8bd9d1 discussed here]). It made similar use of colorless states for geographic information and color in proportion to population for electoral information. However, the FT map is based on the electoral college, not the popular vote. It in turn is similar to a 2013 map used [https://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/interactive/2013/sep/06/australian-election-results-map by The Guardian] for the 2013 Australian election ([https://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/2013/sep/06/better-election-results-map discussed here]). Other compromise maps of geographic and electoral information exist, such as maps of geographically accurate but re-scaled states: a 2016 election example [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ElectorScaledUS2016.svg is here], indirectly inspired by [https://www.vox.com/2015/8/19/9178979/united-states-population a similar vox.com map].
| |
| − | | |
| − | With a stick figure representing 250,000 votes, Trump would have exactly 251.918544 stick figures and Clinton would have exactly 263.37844 stick figures according to the [https://splinternews.com/here-is-the-final-popular-vote-count-of-the-2016-electi-1793864349 final results]. The map shows 252 Trump stick figures and 264 Clinton stick figures, meaning Randall used ceiling rounding instead of conventional rounding, which would have shown Clinton with one fewer stick figure.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Table===
| |
| − | {| class = "wikitable sortable"
| |
| − | !State
| |
| − | !Red
| |
| − | !Blue
| |
| − | !Green
| |
| − | !Total
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Alabama}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| || align="right"| 8
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Alaska}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Arizona}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 10
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Arkansas}} || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|California}} || align="right"| 18 || align="right"| 35 || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 58
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Colorado}} || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 10
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Connecticut}} || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| || align="right"| 5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Delaware}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| || align="right"| 4
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Florida}} || align="right"| 19 || align="right"| 18 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 38
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Georgia (U.S. state|Georgia}} || align="right"| 8 || align="right"| 7 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 16
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Hawaii}} || align="right"| || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Idaho}} || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 3
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Illinois}} || align="right"| 9 || align="right"| 13 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 23
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Indiana}} || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 11
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Iowa}} || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Kansas}} || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Kentucky}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| || align="right"| 8
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Louisiana}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| || align="right"| 8
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Maine}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 3
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Maryland}} || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| || align="right"| 8
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Massachusetts}} || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 7 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 12
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Michigan}} || align="right"| 9 || align="right"| 8 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 18
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Minnesota}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 12
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Mississippi}} || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Missouri}} || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 11
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Montana}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 2
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Nebraska}} || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 3
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Nevada}} || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 4
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|New Hampshire}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 2
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|New Jersey}} || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| 9 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 16
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|New Mexico}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 3
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|New York (state)|New York}} || align="right"| 12 || align="right"| 20 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 34
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|North Carolina}} || align="right"| 10 || align="right"| 9 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 20
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|North Dakota}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Ohio}} || align="right"| 11 || align="right"| 9 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 21
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Oklahoma}} || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 6
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Oregon}} || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 8
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Pennsylvania}} || align="right"| 12 || align="right"| 11 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 24
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Rhode Island}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| || align="right"| 3
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|South Carolina}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 3 || align="right"| || align="right"| 8
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|South Dakota}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Tennessee}} || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 11
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Texas}} || align="right"| 19 || align="right"| 16 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 37
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Utah}} || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 4
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Vermont}} || align="right"| || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Virginia}} || align="right"| 7 || align="right"| 8 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 16
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Washington (state)|Washington}} || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 7 || align="right"| 2 || align="right"| 14
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Washington DC}} || align="right"| || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|West Virginia}} || align="right"| 4 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| 5
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Wisconsin}} || align="right"| 6 || align="right"| 5 || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| 12
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{w|Wyoming}} || align="right"| 1 || align="right"| || align="right"| || align="right"| 1
| |
| − | |-class="sortbottom"
| |
| − | ! Total || align="right"| 252 || align="right"| 264 || align="right"| 30 || align="right"| 546
| |
| − | |}
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Transcript== | | ==Transcript== |
| − | :[A map of the United States, with Hawaii and Alaska offset, is shown. Across the states red, blue and green Cueball like stick figure are scattered about, much more on each coast, and very few in the central parts, especially in the mid west. There are about the same amount of red and blue stick figures. There are not many green, but they are represented almost in any state with more than 10 stick figures. Above the map there is a large bold title. Below that there is a legend description explaining the red, blue and green Cueball stick figure with labels of who they represent next to them. Below this, in light gray text, are two lines of explanation of how the map was created:]
| + | {{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} |
| − | :<big>'''2016 Election Map'''</big>
| |
| − | :Each figure represents 250,000 votes
| |
| − | :[Red stick figure:] Trump
| |
| − | :[Blue stick figure:] Clinton
| |
| − | :[Green stick figure:] Other
| |
| − | :<span style="color:gray">Based on 2016 election results</span>
| |
| − | :<span style="color:gray">Votes are distributed by states as accurately as possible while keeping national totals correct.</span>
| |
| − | :<span style="color:gray">Location within each state is approximate.</span>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| | | | |
| | {{comic discussion}} | | {{comic discussion}} |
| − | | + | A <b>choropleth</b> map is a thematic map in which areas are colored differently to show the measurement of a statistical variable being displayed on the map. |
| − | [[Category:Comics with color]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Large drawings]]
| |
| − | [[Category:US maps]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Elections]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Comics featuring Donald Trump]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Comics featuring politicians]]
| |
