Editing 2078: Popper

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
In this comic, [[Miss Lenhart]] teaches to a class consisting of [[Hairy]], [[Ponytail]], and [[Jill]] about {{w|Karl Popper}}. Karl Popper was a philosopher of science who endorsed the idea that science is distinguished from non-science by treating its theories as falsifiable. This means that science does not treat any theory as definitive, because future research could show that it is false.
+
{{incomplete|There is no evidence that this wasn’t created by a DESCENDANT OF KARL POPPER. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
 +
{{w|Karl Popper}} was a philosopher who believed in falsification but not proof. Under his philosophy, statements could be proven false but could not be proven true. This leads to technicalities like the ones stated in the comic.
  
A not uncommon reading of Popper assumes that instead of proving hypotheses, scientists are disproving hypotheses. This reading leads to technicalities like the ones stated in the comic: Instead of asserting that Popper was indeed born on July 28, 1902, and grew up in Vienna, a scientist can only assert that there is no evidence disproving these facts, which seems counter-intuitive because one cannot disprove the facts of Popper's birthdate and childhood residence.
+
==Transcript==
 
+
: There's no evidence that Karl Popper wasn't born on July 28th, 1902.
Note however that falsifiability is often interpreted to mean that there has to be a way to disprove a given statement if it is wrong, or to distinguish between two mutually competing hypotheses – not that a statement is accepted solely due to the lack of evidence to the contrary. For example, a birth certificate is often used to establish a date of birth and falsifying that date of birth would then mean calling into question the birth certificate's authenticity or accuracy, but without any historical records of the date of birth one would normally not even speculate at all about the precise date of birth. Such reasoning solely on the absence of proof to the contrary would be considered unusual in most contexts.
 
 
 
The humor comes when the comic applies this idea to the life and biographical information of Karl Popper himself. Note that, in real life, such a subject would be a matter for ''historical'' proof, not scientific, and would thus fall outside the realm of study Popper was thinking of.
 
  
The title text takes this reading a couple of steps further in a kind of meta-analysis. It points out that [[Miss Lenhart]]'s claim of no evidence has not been proven false, and also that we're dealing with only the knowledge of a single individual who may not be aware of evidence that might exist.
+
: No one has proven that he didn't grow up in Vienna...
 
 
Another reading of Popper points out that Popper’s philosophy discarded proofs altogether as a defining feature of science. Thus, there is no such thing as definitive evidence in Popper’s notion of science: even falsifying assertions themselves are seen as falsifiable.
 
 
 
==Transcript==
 
:[Miss Lenhart is teaching a class of three students; Hairy, Ponytail, and Jill, sitting behind their desks.]
 
:Miss Lenhart: There's no evidence that Karl Popper wasn't born on July 28th, 1902.
 
:Miss Lenhart: No one has proven that he didn't grow up in Vienna...
 
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
 
[[Category: Comics featuring Miss Lenhart]]
 
[[Category: Comics featuring Miss Lenhart]]
[[Category: Comics featuring Hairy]]
 
[[Category: Comics featuring Ponytail]]
 
[[Category: Comics featuring Jill]]
 
[[Category: Comics featuring real people]]
 
[[Category: Science]]
 
[[Category: Philosophy]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)