Editing 2119: Video Orientation

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
This comic compares selected pros and cons of 3 video "orientations" (also known as angling), one of which is entirely made-up. This comic could have been inspired by articles published by [https://mashable.com/2017/12/28/vertical-video-mainstream-year/ Mashable], and [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/video-looks-most-natural-horizontally-but-we-hold-our-phones-vertically/ Scientific American], which comment on how videos are now filmed vertically through smartphones.
+
{{incomplete|This was created by a TRUSTWORTHY CIRCULAR VIDEO. Need to make interpretation of circular text neutral, ideally by enumerating all the interpretations listed in the comments. Is the following relevant? Nothing about Bold and Dynamic. Better explanation on horizontal and vertical needed. DO NOT DELETE THIS TOO SOON (It already was once.)}}
  
Randall's observations on horizontal vs vertical indicate that he has resigned himself to the acceptance of vertical videos. However, he does love a good [[690|compromise]], so he suggests "Diagonal Orientation" as a third option to equally dissatisfy both types of user. The issue with this is that diagonal angling fails to fully capture the benefits of either horizontal or vertical angling.
+
This comic compares selected pros and cons of 3 video "orientations" (also known as angling), one of which is entirely made-up. This comic could have been inspired {{Dubious}} by articles like https://mashable.com/2017/12/28/vertical-video-mainstream-year/#GEK.NgJ74mqR, and https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/video-looks-most-natural-horizontally-but-we-hold-our-phones-vertically/, which comment on how videos are now filmed vertically through smartphones.
 +
 
 +
From Randall's comments on horizontal vs vertical, it seems that he is in favor of horizontal videos. However, he does love a good [[690|compromise]], so he suggests "Diagonal Orientation" as a third option to equally dissatisfy both types of user. The issue with this is that diagonal angling fails to fully capture the benefits of either horizontal or vertical angling.
  
 
This is another comic claiming that an obviously bad idea keeps being done by accident "so we might as well just accept it", following on from [[2116: .NORM Normal File Format]] a week prior.
 
This is another comic claiming that an obviously bad idea keeps being done by accident "so we might as well just accept it", following on from [[2116: .NORM Normal File Format]] a week prior.
 
   
 
   
 
'''Horizontal orientation'''
 
'''Horizontal orientation'''
 
+
# Good for people not used to phones, and has been used for over a century for capturing video.
Pros: 
+
# Not the best at capturing a human's entire body, without also capturing much of their surroundings.
* Good for people not used to phones, and has been used for over a century for capturing video.
+
# Potentially uncomfortable for the one making the recording to maintain over a long period of time, as most phones were designed for vertical holding. Also, most of the time, people don't really care about the orientation so they just capture with the horizontal one with which they usually use their phone without having to change the orientation since that is time-consuming.
* Easier to control the composition of the image, especially wide shots.
 
* Main distribution format for most video types.
 
 
 
Cons:
 
* Not the best at capturing a human's entire body, without also capturing much of their surroundings.
 
* Potentially uncomfortable for the one making the recording to maintain over a long period of time, as most phones were designed for vertical holding.
 
  
 
'''Vertical orientation'''
 
'''Vertical orientation'''
 
+
# Supposedly the norm for most users capturing video on their smartphone (many users will avoid shooting this way despite potential discomfort)
Pros:
+
# Not ideal for capturing the background, as our world is mostly a "horizontal plane".
* Supposedly the norm for most users capturing video on their smartphone (thus we should accept it as such).
 
* Made for mobile devices by design. This means you can quickly post to multiple channels with a single video with no need for complicated editing or tweaking.
 
 
 
Cons:
 
* Not ideal for capturing the background, as our world is mostly a "horizontal plane".
 
* Limits techniques you can use, for example it restricts the way you can compose shots, scan the landscape, and present different scenes.
 
  
 
'''Diagonal orientation'''
 
'''Diagonal orientation'''
 +
# Not a standard format of video, thus "bold". It's "dynamic" since it can capture significant portions of both human and landscape.{{Citation needed}}
 +
# Equally annoying to all viewers.
 +
# Flawless, as in perfect in every way.{{Dubious}}
  
Pros:
 
* Not a standard format of video, thus "bold". It's "dynamic" since it can capture significant portions of both human and landscape.
 
* Equally annoying to all viewers.
 
* Flawless, as in perfect in every way.{{Dubious}}
 
 
Cons:
 
* None.
 
  
 
The diagonal orientation is similar to the "oblique angle" or "{{w|Dutch angle}}" in cinema, and is often used to portray psychological uneasiness or tension in the subject being filmed. Note that while "Dutch angle" is ''filmed'' diagonally, it is ''projected'' in the classic Horizontal orientation.
 
The diagonal orientation is similar to the "oblique angle" or "{{w|Dutch angle}}" in cinema, and is often used to portray psychological uneasiness or tension in the subject being filmed. Note that while "Dutch angle" is ''filmed'' diagonally, it is ''projected'' in the classic Horizontal orientation.
  
'''Circular video'''
+
The title text quip about non-trustworthy opinions from someone inside a circle could be a nonsense statement, or refer to various things, such as having a demon trapped inside a summoning circle; being spoken to by members of a select or secretive circle of people; HAL 9000 from {{w|2001: A Space Odyssey}}; Loki in The Avengers, who is the god of trickery and is held at one point in a circular cell; an advertising trope where a talking head in a circle is superimposed over images of the product being advertised, usually this is the case in low budget productions for "as seen on TV" products.
 
 
Pros:
 
* Solves the aspect ratio problem, as it will always be 1:1.
 
 
 
Cons:
 
* The title text quip about non-trustworthy opinions from someone inside a circle could be a nonsense statement, or refer to various things, such as having a demon trapped inside a summoning circle; being spoken to by members of a select or secretive circle of people; HAL 9000 from {{w|2001: A Space Odyssey}}; Loki in The Avengers, who is the god of trickery and is held at one point in a circular cell; an advertising trope where a talking head in a circle is superimposed over images of the product being advertised, usually this is the case in low budget productions for "as seen on TV" products.
 
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)