Editing 2337: Asterisk Corrections
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
| − | In text | + | {{incomplete|Created by a MONKEY ** More on what Witchcraft means and what it could mean in the sentences suggested. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon. *BOT}} |
| + | In text messages, asterisks are commonly used to denote a correction of some error in an earlier text. Asterisk corrections typically specify the corrected words, but do not explicitly mark the words that should be replaced. The words that should be replaced are simply the words in the message that make sense to be replaced by the correction, often the ones that are the closest by spelling or meaning to the correction. | ||
| − | In | + | In this comic, the messenger ([[Randall]]) corrects four such inaccuracies. The message, if the corrections were to be taken in order, might read "I'm gonna eat 3 AM on the couch at pizza." The typical reader should be sharp enough to know that it should read "I'm gonna eat a pizza on the couch at 3 AM.", replacing the ones that are closest by function in the sentence. Randall finds this remarkable. |
| − | + | Taken one at a time, it appears the reader would have the following sentences in their head: | |
| + | :I'm gonna ride a horse on the beach at dawn (original sentence - sounds adventurous and sporty) | ||
| + | :I'm gonna '''eat''' a horse on the beach at dawn (replacing the action - a figure of speech?) | ||
| + | :I'm gonna eat a horse on the beach at '''3AM''' (replacing the time - occultish?) | ||
| + | :I'm gonna eat a horse on the '''couch''' at 3AM (replacing the location - lazily occultish, or worse?) | ||
| + | :I'm gonna eat a '''pizza''' on the couch at 3AM (replacing the food - not too odd, but very slobbish) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Human brains can process these corrections automatically because the syntax of most English sentences are as follows: | ||
:''Subject — Verb — Object — Manner — Place — Time'' | :''Subject — Verb — Object — Manner — Place — Time'' | ||
| − | |||
Other languages have different {{w|word order|word orders}} but generally have the same six categories. | Other languages have different {{w|word order|word orders}} but generally have the same six categories. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 34: | ||
* '''Pizza''': object | * '''Pizza''': object | ||
| − | "Couch" and "pizza" are both nouns so they could theoretically be subjects, but asterisk corrections must ''replace'' an existing part of the sentence satisfactorily, so the "'m" part of the verb prevents these third-person nouns from being parsed as the subject. Theoretically one could also swap "couch" and "pizza" around, giving "eat a couch on the pizza", but this makes much less practical sense than "eat a pizza on the couch". That said, in xkcd's fictional universe there is nothing to stop | + | "Couch" and "pizza" are both nouns so they could theoretically be subjects, but asterisk corrections must ''replace'' an existing part of the sentence satisfactorily, so the "'m" part of the verb prevents these third-person nouns from being parsed as the subject. Theoretically one could also swap "couch" and "pizza" around, giving "eat a couch on the pizza", but this makes much less practical sense than "eat a pizza on the couch". That said, in xkcd's fictional universe there is nothing to stop [[White Hat]] from eating a couch on a pizza. |
In the title text, Randall says that he likes to make it as difficult as possible for his text recipient to guess where his correction should be, and uses the following sentence and correction: | In the title text, Randall says that he likes to make it as difficult as possible for his text recipient to guess where his correction should be, and uses the following sentence and correction: | ||
:"I'd love to meet up, maybe in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty." | :"I'd love to meet up, maybe in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty." | ||
: *witchcraft | : *witchcraft | ||
| − | The trick here is | + | The trick here is trying to figure out which word(s) should be replaced by "witchcraft". Broadly speaking, "witchcraft" could serve as an activity, but no words for activities exist in the original sentence, leaving the reader to guess at the intent. Possible solutions suggested in the comments are: |
| + | : "I'd love to '''witchcraft''', maybe in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty." | ||
| + | : "I'd love to meet up, '''witchcraft''' in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty." | ||
| + | : "I'd love to meet up, maybe '''witchcraft''' a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty." (These three examples {{w|verbed}} "witchcraft" to mean "perform witchcraft".) | ||
| + | : "I'd love to meet up, maybe in a few days? '''Witchcraft''' week is looking pretty empty." ([https://www.turismo.navarra.es/eng/organice-viaje/recurso/Ocioycultura/4442/Semana-de-la-Brujeria.htm Witchcraft week] is an event in Bargota, Spain. It usually occurs in July, the month in which this comic strip was released, although this year's event in particular was canceled due to COVID-19 -- which would indeed make it pretty empty.) | ||
| + | : "I'd love to meet up, maybe in a few days? Next '''witchcraft''' is looking pretty empty." | ||
| + | |||
| + | Of course, none of these solutions would be evident as correct to the recipient of the message, until Randall sends further corrections. | ||
| + | |||
| + | One absurdity in the main comic panel is that, after all four corrections has been parsed, the meaning of the resulting sentence has no connection with the original sentence whatsoever. However, asterisk corrections are generally used to correct typing mistakes, not to completely change the meaning of the original message. This raises suspicion as to why the messenger wrote the original sentence in the first place. Perhaps Randall does want to make the comic as difficult for his readers to parse as possible while making the point that asterisk corrections are usually quite intuitive to understand. | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
