Editing 2566: Decorative Constants
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
+ | {{incomplete|Created by a DECORATIVE BOT - What is the formula representing when removing the two decorative constants? - Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | ||
This is another one of [[Randall|Randall's]] [[:Category:Tips|Tips]], this time a Math Tip. | This is another one of [[Randall|Randall's]] [[:Category:Tips|Tips]], this time a Math Tip. | ||
− | + | He gives an example of a complex looking equation (4-15 in the book it is taken from): | |
− | :T = | + | :T = Dm<sub>0</sub>(r<sub>out</sub> - r<sub>in</sub>)<sup>μ</sup> |
− | + | :T: Net rate | |
− | :T | + | :m<sub>0</sub>: Unit mass |
− | + | :(r<sub>out</sub>-r<sub>in</sub>): Flow balance<br> | |
− | + | :D, μ: Decorative | |
− | |||
− | μ | + | But since D and μ are decorative (and μ=1 is the only situation where it does not change everything), then the equation can be reduced to: |
+ | :T = m<sub>0</sub>(r<sub>out</sub> - r<sub>in</sub>) | ||
− | + | Also note that the D is written with two horizontal lines and μ with a bar over the top, to further spice up the formula. | |
− | |||
− | + | This all leads up to the Math tip of the day. If one of your equations ever looks too simple, try adding some purely decorative constants. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | Other examples of well known equations that are profound but look simple are: | |
+ | :E = Mc<sup>2</sup> (from {{w|Special Relativity}}) | ||
+ | :PV = NRT (the {{w|Ideal Gas Law}}) | ||
+ | :F = ma ({{w|Newton's Second Law}}) | ||
+ | :V = IR ({{w|Ohm's Law}}) | ||
+ | These could all use some spicing up with extra constants. | ||
− | + | Maybe this was what {{w|Albert Einstein}} was thinking when he included the {{w|Cosmological Constant}} in {{w|General Relativity}}, but it ended up being meaningful. | |
− | Randall jokes | + | In the title text Randall mentions the {{w|Drag equation}}. In fluid dynamics, the drag equation is a formula used to calculate the force of drag experienced by an object due to movement through a fully enclosing fluid. |
+ | :The equation is: | ||
+ | F<sub>d</sub> = 1/2ρu<sup>2</sup>C<sub>d</sub>A. | ||
+ | Randall jokes about the 1/2 in front is meaningless and thus purely decorative, since the drag coefficients, C<sub>d</sub>, are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big thus leaving out the 1/2 in front of the equation. The 1/2 is thus just an example of a Decorative Constant according to Randall. | ||
− | + | He continues to claim that in some text books the derivations of the formula give more justification for the extra 1/2 than others. But finishes with an example of a book that just calls it "a traditional tribute to Euler and Bernoulli". | |
− | + | This is in reference of {{w|Leonhard Euler}} and the {{w|Bernoulli family}}, possibly mainly {{w|Daniel Bernoulli}} who Euler worked together with to formulate their {{w|Euler–Bernoulli beam theory}}. Euler was a friend of the entire family. Euler is held to be one of the greatest mathematicians in history. The Bernoulli family was a patrician family, notable for having produced eight mathematically gifted academics. Both Euler and Daniel also worked on fluids. | |
− | + | But! First of all the drag equation is attributed to {{w|Lord Rayleigh}}, so that in it self has nothing to do with the two names mentioned. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | Second the 1/2ρu<sup>2</sup> also called P<sub>D</sub> is the dynamic pressure due to kinetic energy of fluid experiencing relative flow velocity u with ρ being the mass density of the fluid. Thus this is analogues to kinetic energy E = 1/2mv<sup>2</sup>, thus the 1/2 comes from this. | |
− | The | + | Third the force F is proportional to P<sub>D</sub>A where A is the area over which the pressure P<sub>D</sub> is applied. The proportionality factor is thus the one called C<sub>d</sub>, the drag coefficient. And thus the 1/2 belongs to a part of the equation, that could be taken out to give a specific value for the dynamic pressure. And it is thus relevant to keep it apart from the otherwise unitless drag coefficient. |
+ | |||
+ | So it seems that this is just another joke by Randall. But possibly he did read the statement in a text book, but a citation for that is needed. | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
:[A small panel only with text. Written as an excerpt from a mathematical text book. Begins with a number for an equation, then follows the equation written in larger letters and symbols. And below are explanations of each term in the equation. The μ has a bar over the top and the D has a double vertical line.] | :[A small panel only with text. Written as an excerpt from a mathematical text book. Begins with a number for an equation, then follows the equation written in larger letters and symbols. And below are explanations of each term in the equation. The μ has a bar over the top and the D has a double vertical line.] | ||
:Eq. 4-15 | :Eq. 4-15 | ||
− | :<big>T = | + | :<big>T = Dm<sub>0</sub>(r<sub>out</sub> - r<sub>in</sub>)<sup>μ</sup></big> |
:T: Net rate | :T: Net rate | ||
:m<sub>0</sub>: Unit mass | :m<sub>0</sub>: Unit mass | ||
:(r<sub>out</sub>-r<sub>in</sub>): Flow balance<br> | :(r<sub>out</sub>-r<sub>in</sub>): Flow balance<br> | ||
− | : | + | :D, μ: Decorative |
:[Caption below the panel:] | :[Caption below the panel:] | ||
:Math tip: If one of your equations ever looks too simple, try adding some purely decorative constants. | :Math tip: If one of your equations ever looks too simple, try adding some purely decorative constants. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} |