Editing 2566: Decorative Constants

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 6: Line 6:
 
| titletext = Arguably, the '1/2' in the drag equation is purely decorative, since drag coefficients are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big. Some derivations give more justification for the extra 1/2 than others, but one textbook just calls it 'a traditional tribute to Euler and Bernoulli.'
 
| titletext = Arguably, the '1/2' in the drag equation is purely decorative, since drag coefficients are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big. Some derivations give more justification for the extra 1/2 than others, but one textbook just calls it 'a traditional tribute to Euler and Bernoulli.'
 
}}
 
}}
 +
*This was the first comic that came out after the [[Countdown in header text]] started.
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
 +
{{incomplete|Created by a DECORATIVE BOT - What is the formula 4-15 representing when removing the two decorative constants? - Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
 
This is another one of [[Randall|Randall's]] [[:Category:Tips|Tips]], this time a Math Tip.
 
This is another one of [[Randall|Randall's]] [[:Category:Tips|Tips]], this time a Math Tip.
  
Line 37: Line 39:
 
Randall jokes that the factor of ½ in the equation is meaningless and purely decorative, since the drag coefficients, ''c''<sub>d</sub>, are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big thus leaving out the ½ in front of the equation. The ½ is thus just an example of a "decorative constant." The usual reason for including the factor of ½ is that it is part of the formula for kinetic energy that appears in the derivation of the drag equation, i.e. ½''ρu''<sup>2</sup>. However, modern treatments are so condensed that this factor of ½ is often smuggled in with no explanation.  
 
Randall jokes that the factor of ½ in the equation is meaningless and purely decorative, since the drag coefficients, ''c''<sub>d</sub>, are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big thus leaving out the ½ in front of the equation. The ½ is thus just an example of a "decorative constant." The usual reason for including the factor of ½ is that it is part of the formula for kinetic energy that appears in the derivation of the drag equation, i.e. ½''ρu''<sup>2</sup>. However, modern treatments are so condensed that this factor of ½ is often smuggled in with no explanation.  
  
Since we can choose the constants to be whatever we want, it could be possible to absorb the ½ into the drag coefficient ''c''<sub>d</sub>, but that does not mean it is unmotivated, since it comes from the kinetic energy. Still, Randall quotes Frank White's ''[https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fluid-Mechanics-Frank-White/dp/007119911X Fluid Mechanics''] textbook, [https://books.google.com/books?id=wGweAQAAIAAJ&q=traditional%20tribute&redir_esc=y which two times] calls it "a traditional tribute to Euler and Bernoulli." According to White, the factor of ½ rather comes from the calculation of the projected area of the object being dragged. Randall has brought up this point before, in his book, "[[How To]]"
+
Since we can choose the constants to be whatever we want, it could be possible to absorb the ½ into the drag coefficient ''c''<sub>d</sub>, but that does not mean it is unmotivated, since it comes from the kinetic energy. Still, Randall quotes Frank White's ''[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi-_77Foqn1AhV3QvEDHSMfAYkQFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.co.uk%2FFluid-Mechanics-Frank-White%2Fdp%2F007119911X&usg=AOvVaw0kLp3oaqh9HaFMV2jLL973 Fluid Mechanics''] textbook, [https://books.google.com/books?id=wGweAQAAIAAJ&q=traditional%20tribute&redir_esc=y which two times] calls it "a traditional tribute to Euler and Bernoulli." According to White, the factor of ½ rather comes from the calculation of the projected area of the object being dragged. Randall has brought up this point before, in his book, "[[How To]]"
  
 
The line from White probably refers to renowned mathematicians {{w|Leonhard Euler}} and {{w|Daniel Bernoulli}}. Euler who is held to be one of the greatest mathematicians in history worked directly with Daniel and was a friend of the {{w|Bernoulli family}}, that produced eight mathematically gifted academics.
 
The line from White probably refers to renowned mathematicians {{w|Leonhard Euler}} and {{w|Daniel Bernoulli}}. Euler who is held to be one of the greatest mathematicians in history worked directly with Daniel and was a friend of the {{w|Bernoulli family}}, that produced eight mathematically gifted academics.
Line 60: Line 62:
 
:[Caption below the panel:]
 
:[Caption below the panel:]
 
:Math tip: If one of your equations ever looks too simple, try adding some purely decorative constants.
 
:Math tip: If one of your equations ever looks too simple, try adding some purely decorative constants.
 
==Trivia==
 
This was the first comic that came out after the [[Countdown in header text]] started.
 
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)