Editing 2600: Rejected Question Categories
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| Requests for help with a crime | | Requests for help with a crime | ||
| Using modern science, what would be the fastest way to get through this bank vault door? [''π'' blueprints] | | Using modern science, what would be the fastest way to get through this bank vault door? [''π'' blueprints] | ||
β | | No, Randall is ''not'' going to help a criminal commit breaking and entering or robbery, thank you very much. A common problem | + | | No, Randall is ''not'' going to help a criminal commit breaking and entering or robbery, thank you very much. A common problem with heist movies is that they show a believable{{Citation needed}} method for breaking in to a vault which people then try to replicate in real life. Such movies often portray an expert in some other field being "smart enough" to craft the plan, sometimes unwittingly. |
|- | |- | ||
| Unanswerable | | Unanswerable |