Editing 446: In Popular Culture

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
βˆ’
{{w|Wikipedia}} is a popular online encyclopedia with articles that are created and edited by the general public.{{Citation needed}} Wikipedia entries have many sections, with the first few explaining the general concept and details behind the subject.
+
{{w|Wikipedia}} is a popular online encyclopedia with articles that are created and edited by the general public{{Citation needed}}. Wikipedia entries have many sections, with the first few explaining the general concept and details behind the subject.
  
 
When this comic was written, many Wikipedia articles had a section at the end entitled "in popular culture," listing TV shows, movies, songs, and so on that made reference to the subject at hand. In many cases, this list was extensive, possibly because the people editing the articles were such fans of the subject or the pop culture in which it is referenced. They couldn't help but go into great detail, listing many esoteric and seemingly irrelevant elements of pop culture that were peripherally related to the subject of the article. As an example, see the old article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apollo_in_popular_culture&oldid=153446837 Apollo in popular culture], which as of August 2007 redirects to {{w|Apollo}}. This comic caused a lot of vandalism adding an "In popular culture" section to the {{w|wood}} page.
 
When this comic was written, many Wikipedia articles had a section at the end entitled "in popular culture," listing TV shows, movies, songs, and so on that made reference to the subject at hand. In many cases, this list was extensive, possibly because the people editing the articles were such fans of the subject or the pop culture in which it is referenced. They couldn't help but go into great detail, listing many esoteric and seemingly irrelevant elements of pop culture that were peripherally related to the subject of the article. As an example, see the old article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apollo_in_popular_culture&oldid=153446837 Apollo in popular culture], which as of August 2007 redirects to {{w|Apollo}}. This comic caused a lot of vandalism adding an "In popular culture" section to the {{w|wood}} page.
Line 18: Line 18:
 
The title text states that in the future, there will even have to be a wiki page with the subject "In popular culture." This article will also need an "in popular culture" section, and it will be obvious to make a reference directly to this title text, as xkcd is part of popular culture and because this title text predicted the creation of and a need for such a page. However, this would then create a circular reference. This could be considered a form of infinite loop, which is one way to cause a computer to crash (lock up). The joke is that the blogosphere could follow this endless train of circular links and itself crash, causing an "implosion."
 
The title text states that in the future, there will even have to be a wiki page with the subject "In popular culture." This article will also need an "in popular culture" section, and it will be obvious to make a reference directly to this title text, as xkcd is part of popular culture and because this title text predicted the creation of and a need for such a page. However, this would then create a circular reference. This could be considered a form of infinite loop, which is one way to cause a computer to crash (lock up). The joke is that the blogosphere could follow this endless train of circular links and itself crash, causing an "implosion."
  
βˆ’
This comic ''was'' actually mentioned in {{w|Wikipedia:"In popular culture" content}} (however, the blogosphere did not implode).{{Citation needed}} However, on April 23, 2014, the reference was edited out, although it was added back in May 2015. It has also been added under the external links section of {{w|Wikipedia:xkcd in popular culture}}.
+
This comic ''was'' actually mentioned in {{w|Wikipedia:"In popular culture" content}} (however, the blogosphere did not implode){{citation needed}}. However, on April 23, 2014, the reference was edited out, although it was added back in May 2015. It has also been added under the external links section of {{w|Wikipedia:xkcd in popular culture}}.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)