Editing 687: Dimensional Analysis

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
Cueball has a [[:Category:My Hobby|hobby]]: showing correct calculations according to the {{w|dimensional analysis}}, but with ridiculous correlations of uncorrelated events and measurements. Here Cueball is giving a talk and uses this trick to ''convince'' his listeners that the {{w|Toyota Prius}} combined {{w|United States Environmental Protection Agency|EPA}} gas mileage is somehow connected to the constant ''{{W|Pi|π}}'' via the {{w|Planck energy}}, the pressure at the {{w|Inner_core|Earth's core}} and the width of the {{w|English Channel}}.  
+
Cueball has a [[My Hobby|hobby]] showing correct calculations according to the {{w|dimensional analysis}} but with ridiculous correlations of uncorrelated events and measurements. Here Cueball is teaching a class and uses this trick to ''convince'' his students that the {{w|Toyota Prius}} combined {{w|United States Environmental Protection Agency|EPA}} gas mileage is somehow connected to the constant ''{{W|Pi|π}}'' via the {{w|Planck energy}}, the pressure at the {{w|Inner_core|earth's core}} and the width of the {{w|English Channel}}.  
  
Scientists — often physicists — use dimensional analysis to quickly check if a given formula can possibly relate to a physical system, because if you end up with an equation claiming that Joules are meters, something is clearly wrong. Dimensional analysis here refers to the check if both sides of the equation arrive at the same physical unit when the units of all variables get plugged into the equation. This requires knowledge of the system of units and the relation between different physical units. Cueball uses the following equation to make a mockery of the practice:
+
Scientists — often physicists — use dimensional analysis to quickly check if a given formula can possibly relate to a physical system, because if you end up with an equation claiming that joules are meters, something is clearly wrong. Dimensional analysis here refers to the check if both sides of the equation arrive at the same physical unit when the units of all variables get plugged into the equation. This requires knowledge of the system of units and the relation between different physical units.
  
<math>\frac{\text{Planck energy}}{\text{Pressure at the core of the Earth}} \times  \frac{\text{Prius combined EPA gas mileage}}{\text{Minimum width of the English Channel}} = \pi</math>
+
Cueball uses the following equation to make a mockery of the practice:
 +
 
 +
(Planck energy) / (Pressure at the core of the earth) * (Prius combined EPA gas mileage) / (minimum width of the English Channel) = π
  
 
===Dimensional analysis===
 
===Dimensional analysis===
Line 18: Line 20:
  
 
*Planck energy: given in Joules [J]
 
*Planck energy: given in Joules [J]
*Pressure at the core of the Earth: often given in Pascals [Pa]
+
*Pressure at the core of the earth: Given in Pascals [Pa]
** In this case, the relationship is used of 1 Pascal [Pa] = 1 Joule per cubic meter [J/m³]
+
*Prius combined EPA gas mileage: gallons/mile, cubic meters/meter [l/m]
*Prius combined EPA gas mileage: miles per gallon, given in meters per cubic meter [m/m³]
+
**Fuel efficiency has two formats that are commonly used: length/volume and volume/length. The former must be used here in order to get the units to cancel correctly.
**Fuel efficiency has two formats that are commonly used: length per volume and volume per length. The former must be used here in order to get the units to cancel correctly.
+
*minimum width of the English channel: meters [m]
*Minimum width of the English Channel: given in meters [m]
 
  
When plugged into the left-hand side, this amounts to:
+
When plugged into the left hand side this amounts to:
  
<math>\frac{\text{J}}{\frac{\text{J}}{\text{m}^3}} \times \frac{\frac{\text{m}}{\text{m}^3}}{\text{m}} = \text{m}^3 \times \frac{1}{\text{m}^3} = 1</math>
+
[(J / Pa) * ((m/l) / m)] = [(Nm / (N/m²)) * ((m/m³) / m)] = 1
  
Note that for dimensional analysis constant factors are not taken into account. Here square brackets are used to denote dimensional analysis. In the above equation the unit of energy (joule) as well as all the unit of volume (cubic meter) cancel out each other.
+
Using the following unit relations (this does not reduce units to the seven SI units, but does use some derived units):
  
Another aspect of the comic is that sometimes dimension analysis of equations that were not derived but rather "made up" can provide insight. However, in reality such an equation would have to be somehow "motivated", which is more of an art than science and requires great experience in the field the equation should relate to. The presented equation combines values that have no immediate causal relation with each other, so it does not make sense. Furthermore, since the values have absolutely no causal relation to each other, the ratios presented are simple coincidence; despite Cueball's claim, building a better Prius would not cause any changes to the English Channel.
+
*1 Joule = 1 Newton-meter  [J] = [Nm]
 +
*1 Pascal = 1 Newton per square-meter [Pa] = [N/m²]
 +
*1 cubic-metre = 1000 litres [m³] = 1000 [l]
 +
 
 +
Note that for dimensional analysis constant factors are not taken into account. Here square brackets are used to denote dimensional analysis. In the above equation the unit of force (newton) as well as all the units of length (meter) cancel out each other.
 +
 
 +
Another aspect of the comic is, that sometimes dimension analysis of equations that were not derived but rather "made up" can provide insight. However, in reality such an equations would have to be somehow "motivated", which is more of an art than science and requires great experience in the field the equation should relate to. The presented equation combines values that have no immediate causal relation with each other, so it does not make sense. Furthermore, since the values have absolutely no causal relation to each other, the ratios presented are simple coincidence; despite Cueball's claim, building a better Prius would not cause any changes to the English Channel.  
  
 
The title text also refers to this, as a higher pressure at Earth's core could also balance the equation, keeping the result constant equal to ''π''. The Planck energy is an absolute, however, so it is not mentioned as a way to balance the next version of Prius.
 
The title text also refers to this, as a higher pressure at Earth's core could also balance the equation, keeping the result constant equal to ''π''. The Planck energy is an absolute, however, so it is not mentioned as a way to balance the next version of Prius.
Line 36: Line 43:
 
===Some numbers for this calculation===
 
===Some numbers for this calculation===
 
The {{w|Planck energy}} is the only nearly exact value we do have. Compared to other Planck values it is very large (macroscopic).
 
The {{w|Planck energy}} is the only nearly exact value we do have. Compared to other Planck values it is very large (macroscopic).
  E_planck = 1.956 x 10<sup>9</sup> J
+
  E_planck = 1.956 x 10<sup>9</sup> J =  1.956 x 10<sup>9</sup> Nm
  
Pressure at the {{w|Inner_core#Temperature_and_pressure|core}} of the Earth ranges from 330 to 360 gigapascals.
+
Pressure at the {{w|Inner_core#Temperature_and_pressure|core}} of the earth ranges from 330 to 360 gigapascals.
 
Using a simple value like this:
 
Using a simple value like this:
  P_core = 350 GPa = 3.5 x 10<sup>11</sup> J/
+
  P_core = 350 GPa = 3.5 x 10<sup>11</sup> N/
  
 
Prius combined {{w|Toyota_Prius#Fuel_economy_and_emissions|EPA gas mileage}}:
 
Prius combined {{w|Toyota_Prius#Fuel_economy_and_emissions|EPA gas mileage}}:
For the third generation (from 2010) the [https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=26425 combined EPA gas mileage] is 50 miles per gallon.
+
For the third generation (from 2010) the City mileage is 51 mpg and the Highway mileage is 48 mpg. But it is the [http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=26425 combined EPA gas mileage] which is used in the equation and that is 50 mpg.
  50 mpg => 21,000,000 m/
+
  50 mpg => 13.2 miles per litre => 21,000,000 meter per
  
 
Minimum width of the {{w|English Channel}} is about
 
Minimum width of the {{w|English Channel}} is about
  33.1&nbsp;km = 33,100&nbsp;m
+
  33.1&nbsp;km or 33,100 meters.
  
Calculating from these values you will get ''π'' = 3.54... that is pretty close to ''π'' = 3.14... while using a Planck value. According to Cueball this will be within the experimental error (the combined error for all four numbers - none are exact numbers). For instance if you tried the ePrius you would may get closer to pi — as the distance per fuel quantity in real life usage usually is somewhat lower than the standardized test value advertised — and that would reduce the result.
+
Calculating from these values you will get ''π'' = 3.54... that is pretty close to ''π'' = 3.14... while using a Planck value. According to Cueball this will be within the experimental error (the combined error for all four numbers - none are exact numbers). For instance if you tried the ePrius you would probably get closer to that target — as the mileage in real life usually is somewhat lower than the value given — and that would reduce the result.
  
[https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28Planck+Energy%29%2F%28Pressure+at+the+Earth%27s+core%29*%282010+Prius+combined+EPA+Gas+Mileage%29%2F%2833.1+km%29 Wolfram|Alpha can find most of the statistics and do the calculations.]
+
[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28Planck+Energy%29%2F%28Pressure+at+the+earth%27s+core%29*%28Prius+combined+EPA+Gas+Mileage%29%2F%2833.1+km%29 Wolfram|Alpha can find most of the statistics and do the calculations.]
 +
 
 +
=== Trivia ===
 +
This definition of pi uses, among other values, the width of the English channel. Incidentally, an approximation of pi can be found using natural water bodies: The sinuousity of a freely meandering river approaches pi. The {{w|sinuousity}} is the ratio of the true length (as the water flows) and the straight line, from river source to river delta.[https://www.theguardian.com/science/alexs-adventures-in-numberland/2015/mar/14/pi-day-2015-pi-rivers-truth-grime]
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
Line 66: Line 76:
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]
Line 72: Line 81:
 
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]
 
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]
 
[[Category:My Hobby]]
 
[[Category:My Hobby]]
[[Category:Math]]
 
[[Category:Physics]]
 
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)