Editing 743: Infrastructures

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
[[Cueball]] has sent an essay to his friend, likely [[Richard Stallman]], an advocate of free and open-source software. While the essay itself was good, Stallman worries because the essay was in the {{w|Doc (computing)|.doc}} format, the {{w|Proprietary Software|proprietary format}} that old versions of {{w|Microsoft Word}} used. He advises Cueball to use a format based on an open standard, possibly ODF, ODT, ODS, ODP, or {{w|OpenDocument|other types}} derived from something such as {{w|OpenOffice.org XML}}.
+
[[Cueball]] has sent an essay to a fellow. While the essay itself was good, his fellow was worried because the essay was in the {{w|Doc (computing)|.doc}} format, the {{w|Proprietary Software|proprietary format}} that old versions of {{w|Microsoft Word}} used. The fellow advises Cueball to use a format based on an open standard.  He may thinking of the ODF format (file extensions <code>.odt</code>, <code>.ods</code>, <code>.odp</code>, etc.) used in {{w|OpenOffice}} and {{w|LibreOffice}}, which are both {{w|free software}}. ODF was not standardised until 2005, but was based on OpenOffice XML which has existed since about 2000, and there were other open markup languages such as Docbook, LaTeX and HTML.
  
Cueball, who does not appreciate Stallman criticizing the file format over the actual contents of the file, accuses him of pedantically stirring up trouble instead of simply caring that the software works (which is what most regular users would be concerned about). Given that it can be a challenge to move from a familiar proprietary application to an open-source rival which may lack compatibility, features, support, and popularity, Cueball's stance is not entirely unjustified.
+
Cueball, who does not appreciate the fellow's ideology, argued that the fellow is making petty fights about the details of software instead of simply bothering that the software works (which is, in essence, a primordial purpose of software). Given that it can be a challenge to move from a familiar proprietary application to an open-source rival which may lack compatibility, features, support and popularity, Cueball has *some* justification for his stance.
  
Stallman tries to explain that he is just concerned about the current proprietary software infrastructure that forces users to use software in a specific way, penalizing them for sharing the software or even preventing looking at the source code in order to learn what the program actually does or how it works. Cueball, however, isn't buying it, and accuses him of having [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html an arrogance that crowds out his perspective], while also claiming that he is {{w|Autism|autistic}}, an ableist epithet often aimed, particularly by denizens of online forums and imageboards, at people who have an intense fixation on seemingly trivial things.
+
The bearded fellow brings up that he is just concerned about the current proprietary software infrastructure that forces users to use software in a specific way, penalizing them for sharing the software or even preventing looking at the source code in order to learn what the program actually does or how it works. Cueball makes a retort that his fellow has [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html an arrogance that crowds out his perspective] while claiming that he is {{w|Autism|autistic}}. (Autistic people do have a tendency to have intense fixations to things, even things that other people would find mundane or even odd. They also tend to have trouble knowing the problems of the world outside of themselves, having them lack perspective of things at times. Even so, Cueball's remark suggests that he thinks that "autistic" is just another word for "retarded" which is another word for "stupid", a double-fallacy.)
  
Seven years later, Cueball runs to Stallman, having become alarmed at Facebook's immense control and dubious policies about the personal information it collects. Since this is exactly the kind of situation Stallman was warning against, he sarcastically retorts by producing "the world's tiniest open-source violin". This is a twist on "{{tvtropes|WorldsSmallestViolin|playing the world's smallest violin}}", a gesture used to convey sarcastic pity at someone else's misfortune. Interestingly, he does actually appear to possess the physical instrument itself, which is uncommon. This implies that he has been carrying around the violin for this eventuality (not unlike what [[Black Hat]] does in [[757: Toot]]), or perhaps he uses this sarcastic expression often enough to warrant it. Since the violin is so tiny, it is rendered only by a few pixels forming a line bottomed with an ovoid shape resembling the vague shape of a violin. The problem with the lack of open source and Facebook is also the subject of [[1390: Research Ethics]].
+
Seven years later, Cueball runs to the fellow, alarmed about Facebook's heavy policies about its complete control about the information its users submit. Since Facebook is like Microsoft in its lack of transparency about their services and taking away a lot of control from the user, the fellow retorts with playing "the world's tiniest open-source violin."   This is dubious since "[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WorldsSmallestViolin playing the world's smallest violin]" is a [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=World%27s+Smallest+Violin sarcastic expression] that denotes that the speaker will not give pity to the recipient.
 +
 
 +
In response to this comic people released [http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3193 3d printer specifications for tiny violins], as open source files. This one was designed by Allan Ecker.
  
 
The title text references the following pieces of infrastructure that are compatible with the "free software" ideology:
 
The title text references the following pieces of infrastructure that are compatible with the "free software" ideology:
* [https://www.creativecommons.org Creative Commons licenses] (CC licensed) use existing copyright law to permit someone to share a creative work anywhere so long as the sharer attributes credit to the creator of the work. The particular CC license chosen may also allow for modification, derivative works, and/or commercial usage. The fellow's phrase "you can get it" in the title text is ambiguous: is he offering to share the code for the violin, or the tune that the violin plays? But since CC licenses are not used for software, we can assume "it" refers to the tune: either an audio recording of it, or perhaps source material from which to make modified versions.
+
* [http://www.creativecommons.org Creative Commons licenses] (CC licensed) use existing copyright law to permit someone to share a creative work anywhere so long as the sharer attributes credit to the creator of the work. The particular CC license chosen may also allow for modification, derivative works, and/or commercial usage. The fellow's phrase "you can get it" in the title text is ambiguous: is he offering to share the code for the violin, or the tune that the violin plays? But since CC licenses are not used for software, we can assume "it" refers to the tune: either an audio recording of it, or perhaps source material from which to make modified versions.
* [https://diasporafoundation.org diasporafoundation.org] (formerly joindiaspora.net, and then joindiaspora.com) is the central host of {{w|Diaspora (social network)| Diaspora*}}, an open-source alternative to Facebook which puts the user in control of how their information is used. Of course, this sort of use of Diaspora would eliminate Cueball's concern over how Facebook handled his information. A few months after this comic released, a consumer alpha version of Diaspora* was released, and, after more than a decade, an official version would be released.
+
* [http://joindiaspora.com joindiaspora.com] (formerly joindiaspora.net) is the central host of {{w|Diaspora (social network)| Diaspora*}}, an open-source alternative to Facebook which puts the user in control of how their information is used. Of course this sort of use of Diaspora would eliminate Cueball's concern over how Facebook handled his information.
* a Diaspora "seed" is a personal web server that interacts in a Diaspora "pod" of servers. It stores all of your information (such as the tune in this case) and shares it with your friends, in a way that respects your preferences around privacy, etc.
+
* a Diaspora "seed" is a personal web server that interacts in a Diaspora "pod" of servers. It stores all of your information (such as the tune in this case) and shares it with your friends, in a way that respects your preferences around privacy, etc.
 +
 
 +
The problem with the lack of open source and Facebook is also the subject of [[1390: Research Ethics]].
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
Line 38: Line 42:
 
:[Inset, the bearded fellow rubs his index and middle fingers against his thumb.]
 
:[Inset, the bearded fellow rubs his index and middle fingers against his thumb.]
 
:Bearded Fellow: ''It's the world's tiniest open-source violin.''
 
:Bearded Fellow: ''It's the world's tiniest open-source violin.''
 
==Trivia==
 
In response to this comic, a [https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3193 3D model for a tiny violin] was released as open-source files.
 
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
[[Category:Comics featuring Richard Stallman]]
 
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]
 
 
[[Category:Programming]]
 
[[Category:Programming]]
 
[[Category:Social networking]]
 
[[Category:Social networking]]

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)