Difference between revisions of "Talk:1209: Encoding"
(→Just from real life: new section) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | "Skytyping" uses five or more planes flying in formation to skywrite in a dot-matrix format. It is computer controlled, so it really could have codepage issues.[[Special:Contributions/68.3.11.239|68.3.11.239]] 23:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:36, 11 May 2013
He may have lost control whilst trying to fly in squares... What‽ --DanB (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
I've always thought that "interrobang" was one of the coolest words in the English language. Don't ya think?! --Dangerkeith3000 (talk) 15:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
I think the "C0 Block" text may also be a skywriting double meaning, as skywriters use something called "Corvus Oil" to make the smoke.24.234.164.78 18:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Dustin
Saying that the C0 block ‘is there’ makes me think that the skywriter already wrote it; perhaps they hired the skywriter to write out all of Unicode in order‽ The interrobang is followed by a diacritic (overline), but unfortunately it's not combining. (The combining overline comes later.) —TobyBartels (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Just from real life
Many of the web servers I am responsible for are using [[1]EBCDIC]. Browsers are on [[2]ASCII].
I can tell you that this is the hell.
--Dgbrt (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
"Skytyping" uses five or more planes flying in formation to skywrite in a dot-matrix format. It is computer controlled, so it really could have codepage issues.68.3.11.239 23:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)