Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ;"Random" | | ;"Random" |
− |
| |
− | Are we ''sure'' that's [[Hairy]]? He looks significantly shorter than Black Hat, and in the title text Randall talks about doing this when he was a '''kid''', so maybe that kid is Randall? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.136|172.68.54.136]] 00:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
| Are the numbers in the speech bubble truely random (as in is there a real pattern)? Can someone check? | | Are the numbers in the speech bubble truely random (as in is there a real pattern)? Can someone check? |
| --[[User:Charlesisbozo|Charlesisbozo]] ([[User talk:Charlesisbozo|talk]]) 08:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | | --[[User:Charlesisbozo|Charlesisbozo]] ([[User talk:Charlesisbozo|talk]]) 08:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
Line 90: |
Line 87: |
| | | |
| Anyway, that's it. HTH, HAND, and I'm not spending any more time on this analysis from now on. Probably... [[Special:Contributions/178.98.253.89|178.98.253.89]] 15:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | | Anyway, that's it. HTH, HAND, and I'm not spending any more time on this analysis from now on. Probably... [[Special:Contributions/178.98.253.89|178.98.253.89]] 15:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
| ;"I'm so Random" | | ;"I'm so Random" |
− | Is it just me, or does this sound like those people at parties who drink a tiny bit, and then spend the whole party saying, "oh my Julia I'm soooo drunk right now!" | + | Is it just me, or does this sound like those people at parties who drink a tiny bit, and then spend the whole party saying, "Oh my god I'm soooo drunk right now!" |
| [[Special:Contributions/99.237.74.83|99.237.74.83]] 11:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | | [[Special:Contributions/99.237.74.83|99.237.74.83]] 11:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
| | | |
Line 99: |
Line 97: |
| | | |
| [1] kitten cupcakes, kitten falafel, snail falafel, snail corn, aardvark corn, aardvark baklava, aardvark vindaloo | | [1] kitten cupcakes, kitten falafel, snail falafel, snail corn, aardvark corn, aardvark baklava, aardvark vindaloo |
− |
| |
− | :Of course, now that you've written it here, that is no longer the case. Although surprisingly, the only result that came up was an unrelated Italian blog with a generic link back to this wiki. For the time being, however, you are the proud owner of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlewhack Googlewhack]. --[[User:H|H]] ([[User talk:H|talk]]) 18:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | ::Haha. I don't think any googlewhacks have been discovered in years. A true googlewhack must be found without quotes. ''— [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 16:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)''
| |
− | :::if you count antewhacks, then zwoddery aphasia counts {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.101}}
| |
− |
| |
− | :::How about this, without quotes: "w10: brcms_c_radio_timer: dead chip". Got this message from my netbook, which I failed to handle properly a few times in the last few years. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.252|108.162.210.252]] 02:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
| | | |
| ;"lexical white noise" | | ;"lexical white noise" |
| Interesting, since Black Hat speaks only digits! No letters, words, diacritical marks, silly unicode characters, or Fred Flintstone outbursts. The blast of numbers seems to come out in a 2D bubble, yet speech is strictly sequential (each character can have at most two neighbors). The noise is uninteresting at best and likely unwanted, but not unnecessary (sic). It did seem to do the trick. The pesky kid was squelched, Black Hat resumed his work (or whatever).[[User:Galois|Galois]] ([[User talk:Galois|talk]]) 14:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | | Interesting, since Black Hat speaks only digits! No letters, words, diacritical marks, silly unicode characters, or Fred Flintstone outbursts. The blast of numbers seems to come out in a 2D bubble, yet speech is strictly sequential (each character can have at most two neighbors). The noise is uninteresting at best and likely unwanted, but not unnecessary (sic). It did seem to do the trick. The pesky kid was squelched, Black Hat resumed his work (or whatever).[[User:Galois|Galois]] ([[User talk:Galois|talk]]) 14:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
− | In fact randomness contains more information as it can't be compressed; I have no idea what Randall means by saying that in information theory randomness is uninteresting.[[User:Yehoshua2|Yehoshua2]] ([[User talk:Yehoshua2|talk]]) 17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− | ...'mean and []bullying'? I find this an appropriate response/retribution towards all those proles who think that being random is a viable source of humour. [[User:Greyson|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson|talk]]) 23:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | And after overwhelming Hairy he just turns back to his computer... Typical Black Hat. And the last panel is ''perfect'' for a profile picture. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 09:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | ;Odd things that have results
| |
− |
| |
− | :Endothermic Zymurgy
| |
− | :Syzygy Chimneysweep
| |
− | :Thermobaric CheeseGrater (???) {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.101}}
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | ;Is it random
| |
− |
| |
− | GOOOGLE is still prove (every law is wrong):
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 1954678
| |
− | About 57,600 results (0.09 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 2954678
| |
− | About 83,300 results (0.10 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 3954678
| |
− | About 497,000 results (0.24 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 4954678
| |
− | About 451,000 results (0.24 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 5954678
| |
− | About 359,000 results (0.25 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 6954678
| |
− | About 46,300 results (0.40 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 7954678
| |
− | About 348,000 results (0.24 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 8954678
| |
− | About 45,400 results (0.24 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− | Search 9954678
| |
− | About 287,000 results (0.23 seconds)
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | So this law is not valid according to my investigations above:
| |
− | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law]
| |
− |
| |
− | And I am also random...
| |
− | --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | : Just for understanding: I should get get a peak at 1xxxxxx and the lowest result at 9xxxxxx. Just changing the first number.
| |
− | : According to Benford it should be look much different, and my first test on Gooo a few weeks ago did match. Maybe my 7-digit test is not random or it's just a mystery...
| |
− | :--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | :: Maybe the second digit z9xxxxx is my problem. Still strange, Ask Benford...
| |
− | ::--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | ::: Seven digit is too low. Telephone numbers may have 7 digits (up to 10 actually) and they are not random (at least not in a way Benford's law need). And multiple entries in that google search ARE related to telephone numbers. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | ;Trochees
| |
− | You sure "tacos" is a trochee? Seems more like a spondee to me. [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] ([[User talk:Stevage|talk]]) 01:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | That's some stealth nerd sniping there, Randall. I sincerely did not expect to read someone suggesting that he could've encoded data in the derivative data. Even after reading 1210 comics. Also, it's been two of those in the last three comics. Damn. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.37|108.162.229.37]] 04:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
| |