Difference between revisions of "Talk:1308: Christmas Lights"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If I am reading the graphs right, except for the very top there is no blue lights. | If I am reading the graphs right, except for the very top there is no blue lights. | ||
[[User:Traisjames|From the guy with his eye on the sky.]] ([[User talk:Traisjames|talk]]) 06:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC) | [[User:Traisjames|From the guy with his eye on the sky.]] ([[User talk:Traisjames|talk]]) 06:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Presumably the top is gold? | ||
Also the spike in the near IR of the large graph is likely to be a mercury line. I think fires would have a smoother curve of a black body. | Also the spike in the near IR of the large graph is likely to be a mercury line. I think fires would have a smoother curve of a black body. |
Revision as of 07:45, 25 December 2013
If I am reading the graphs right, except for the very top there is no blue lights. From the guy with his eye on the sky. (talk) 06:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Presumably the top is gold?
Also the spike in the near IR of the large graph is likely to be a mercury line. I think fires would have a smoother curve of a black body. 199.27.128.122 06:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Could someone make a coloured version?Guru-45 (talk) 07:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Also the light at the top of the tree seems to be emitting in the UV range. Perhaps it’s supposed to be a fluorescent lamp? 108.162.245.7 07:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)