Editing Talk:1310: Goldbach Conjectures
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
The paradoxical prime conjecture states that the paradoxical prime conjecture is false. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.220|108.162.250.220]] 07:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC) | The paradoxical prime conjecture states that the paradoxical prime conjecture is false. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.220|108.162.250.220]] 07:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | + | Maybe it could be added in the explanation that, the extremely strong conjecture being proven true, all others would hold (extremely weak is problematic). I deduced that from reading the explanation alone, but I really can't know if it's clear enough for everyone. Plus, without understanding this, the conjecture alone sounds very weird. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.125|108.162.219.125]] 01:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC) | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | 10 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |