Difference between revisions of "Talk:1627: Woosh"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Woosh[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.65|173.245.56.65]] 10:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | :Woosh[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.65|173.245.56.65]] 10:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | Probably in reaction to a video | + | Probably in reaction to a video [https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEI-iDxfj0M] that gained notoriety this week and raised a big discussion whether is was spontaneous or enacted. |
− | [https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEI-iDxfj0M] | + | [[User:Duartix|Duartix]] ([[User talk:Duartix|talk]]) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:16, 8 January 2016
Looking for a joke that isn't there sounds a lot like xkcd.com/559. 162.158.2.140 05:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Woooosh! 108.162.245.181 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Woosh
Woof (Guess my bot still needs some work) 162.158.153.131 08:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
If it was a joke video that was never meant to be real to begin with and the commenter didn't realize this, then woosh would actually make sense Figvh (talk)
- Woosh173.245.56.65 10:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Probably in reaction to a video [1] that gained notoriety this week and raised a big discussion whether is was spontaneous or enacted. Duartix (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)