Difference between revisions of "Talk:1672: Women on 20s"
(Eye of Providence) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.23|108.162.217.23]] 14:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.23|108.162.217.23]] 14:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The real question: why can't the Treasury leave the $10 bill alone, redesign the $20 bill (with Harriet Tubman on both sides), and release that redesign in the 2020s as planned? There is no rush here, so long as it is done. | ||
+ | [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.61|173.245.50.61]] 15:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:34, 25 April 2016
One (potentially) legitimate concern I have seen expressed regarding the proposed rollout date for the redesigned $20s is that we may not be using paper money anymore by then! Raj-a-Kiit (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
The weird creepy looking eye thing is the Eye of Providence. And now that Randall mentioned it, I somehow have an intense emotional need to see a series of US currency with the Eye of Providence as the featured portrait on every bill....
108.162.217.23 14:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
The real question: why can't the Treasury leave the $10 bill alone, redesign the $20 bill (with Harriet Tubman on both sides), and release that redesign in the 2020s as planned? There is no rush here, so long as it is done. 173.245.50.61 15:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)