| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | :I originally read it as "sunglasses smiley", of the same style as ";)" [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 19:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC) | | :I originally read it as "sunglasses smiley", of the same style as ";)" [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 19:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| β | But seriously, it was funny the first time. I'm sorry for the above incomplete tag in the comments{{Citation needed}},but it feels like most comics since maybe #1900 ([[1914: Twitter Verification]] comes to mind...) have this kind of thing for their incomplete tag. Maybe if it's spaced out more, instead of put into nearly every comic nowadays, it won't be so much of a problem. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.184|162.158.75.184]] 18:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | + | {{incomplete|Created by a MILLENIAL who has had enough of these weird incomplete tags}} |
| β | : If you can address this problem, please edit the user. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.26|162.158.155.26]] 23:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
| + | But seriously, it was funny the first time.[[Citation needed]] I'm sorry for the above incomplete tag in the comments,[[Citation needed] but it feels like most comics since maybe #1900 ([[1914: Twitter Verification]] comes to mind...) have this kind of thing for their incomplete tag. Maybe if it's spaced out more, instead of put into nearly every comic nowadays, it won't be so much of a problem. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.184|162.158.75.184]] 18:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| β | ::Removed the incomplete tag, changed the citation needed tag into the correct one. Dude, please don't do that again, it's not funny, just seriously annoying. The incomplete tag is not there for you to abuse. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 12:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | :::Oh, and now that I've finally caught up to you, 162.158.155.26, please check your talk page. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 12:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | Can someone help me? [[User:Halo422|Halo422]] ([[User talk:Halo422|talk]]) 20:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | | Can someone help me? [[User:Halo422|Halo422]] ([[User talk:Halo422|talk]]) 20:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| Line 16: |
Line 14: |
| | What's the emoji 2000-2017? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.141.214|172.68.141.214]] 21:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | | What's the emoji 2000-2017? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.141.214|172.68.141.214]] 21:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| | :I think I found it: π
[https://emojipedia.org/nail-polish/ "nail-polish"] (Comes up very different on different systems) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.233|162.158.79.233]] 21:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | | :I think I found it: π
[https://emojipedia.org/nail-polish/ "nail-polish"] (Comes up very different on different systems) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.233|162.158.79.233]] 21:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| β | :Couldn't this emoji, and hence the title "Generation π
", refer to the rise of nail care salons or manicure salons during the recent years? I don't know about other countries, but at least in certain parts of Europe, Germany in particular, there seems to be such a boom of this kind of establishments that IΒ often wonder how they survive and open even more such businesses, even though it appears there's more nail salons than (manicured) nails in town. [[User:Passerby|Passerby]] ([[User talk:Passerby|talk]]) 20:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | I have to believe the 1748 - 1765 generation is some form of "Long s" such as U+1E9C or U+1E9D [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.233|162.158.79.233]] 21:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | | I have to believe the 1748 - 1765 generation is some form of "Long s" such as U+1E9C or U+1E9D [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.233|162.158.79.233]] 21:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| | : It looks more like a forte ([https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1d191/index.htm U+1D191]). I'm not sure why that would be funnyβmaybe because of [[Wikipedia:fortepiano|fortepiano]]s? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.214|172.69.69.214]] 21:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | | : It looks more like a forte ([https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1d191/index.htm U+1D191]). I'm not sure why that would be funnyβmaybe because of [[Wikipedia:fortepiano|fortepiano]]s? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.214|172.69.69.214]] 21:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| β | ::My position comes from the fact that documents written by this generation (i.e. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s#/media/File:Long-s-US-Bill-of-Rights.jpg Declaration of Independance] and the US Constitution) are noted for having this letter form. The script form of the long s looks like what Randall has written, which, to your point, looks like a "forte" [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.233|162.158.79.233]] 22:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | ::: Actually, it quite clearly is '''not''' long s. Long s only has the tic on the left side of the main stroke, not on both sides as is the case here. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.118|162.158.78.118]] 22:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | :::: I read it as an italic lower-case F, ''f'', as used to denote [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Function_(mathematics) mathematical functions]. I think it looks more like one of those than a [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Long_s longΒ s], ΕΏ, though I don't have an explanation for why that would be used to name a generation. [[User:Smylers|Smylers]] ([[User talk:Smylers|talk]]) 09:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | Hitler was born in 1889, about three years before the "Oops, one of us is Hitler" generation ... --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.240|141.101.105.240]] 21:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | | Hitler was born in 1889, about three years before the "Oops, one of us is Hitler" generation ... --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.240|141.101.105.240]] 21:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC) |
| β |
| |
| β | Can someone who's a big Trekkie than I am help explain the dates for ''Star Trek: The Next Generation''? If we're going off of the events of the show + movies, it seems to start well before the events of the show and end before the last of the movies. [[User:PvOberstein|PvOberstein]] ([[User talk:PvOberstein|talk]]) 21:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | :Year 2378 may be explained by last episode of Voyager happening that year, but no idea about year 2360. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | ::Year 2360 is when the humans who became adults (18) in 2378 were born. This time-span is probably when the majority of human TNG characters would have been born (not necessarily notable ones). This is similar to how people born in 1982 became the first new adults in the new millenium. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.143|172.68.46.143]] 05:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | :::William T. Riker was born in 2335, Jean Luc Picard 2305, Deanna Troi 2336, Data 2338, Guinan ... ehmmm ... well she was already adult in 1893. Even Wesley Crusher was born 2348. They don't allow children on bridge. Usually. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Filled in most of the table with explanations (I'm pretty sure most of the latter generation names are references to potential transhumanist futures), but I'm not sure what "Second-Greatest" Generation refers to unless it's about the Civil War. Also, I'm not entirely certain whether the generation before the gilded one was cut a lot of slack. And I'll let someone more versed in standard sociological history fill in the common reasons for the core 20th century generations.[[User:WingedCat|WingedCat]] ([[User talk:WingedCat|talk]]) 22:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | ;Paperclip machine
| |
| β | I think the paperclip machines refer to the browser game "Universal Paperclips", where paperclip machines take over the universe. [http://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html]. Best regards, [[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.10|172.68.110.10]] 11:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | The incomplete explination tag seemed to be a useless joke, so I deleted it.
| |
| β |
| |
| β | ;Ξ©
| |
| β | Wow thatβs a lot of speculation on the Ξ© generation! 177 words of it! Who knew people could imagine so much inspired by a single character (and no historical context to extrapolate from). Personally, I tend to think of it as the βresistance generationβ given my electronic background π. [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 15:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β | :Ξ© may be a reference to Year Omega in the novel {{w|The Children of Men}}. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.172|172.69.69.172]] 18:04, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Why is there an incomplete tag in the transcript? What's wrong with it? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.148|108.162.216.148]] 22:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Millennials were *originally* called "Echo Boomers" (after the Baby Boomers, and because most of them are that generation's kids), "Generation Y" came later but before "Millennials" stuck as a non-snowclone name. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.100|162.158.63.100]] 01:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Generation X being the tenth generation of Americans seems a bit of a stretch. A generation is generally 35 years, and seems unlikely to be less than 20. And [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X#Origin_of_term Douglas Coupland], who coined this use of the term, used "X" as lazy shorthand for alienation and a rejection of societal norms. If no one objects, I'll update the text. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.33|162.158.158.33]] 09:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | "1730 - 1747 Most of the United States' Founding Fathers were born in this period. (But not all: Benjamin Franklin, for instance, was born two generations prior, in 1706.)" So, since when is a generation 12 years? [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 00:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| β | :It's the first time I've read(/noticed) that, and I'm not sure I would have said it myself, but... One generation in those days might well average at <26 years, so the intergenerational gap might be best considered as two such generations (e.g. like a great-uncle, being your grandfather's youngest brother, sort of age) rather than one (just an uncle, such as your mother's ''eldest'' brother), what with the tendency for early children ''and'' big families making the advance of generations more pertinent than their onward persistence through time.
| |
| β | :I may be overthinking it, but that sounds to me like a credible justification for the choice of words, should it not just be an error/thinko... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.121|162.158.159.121]] 03:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | β This also implies that Napoleon's generation was named after him.β Why does it say this when there is absolutely no such implication? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.116|108.162.246.116]] 12:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| β | :The others namechecked in Mixed Bag, (Hitler and Licoln) have generations here-named for (or, better, ''about'') them. I agree it's not quite right. Perhaps "This also implies that a neo-Napoleonic generation might have been named for their own neo-Napoleon". i.e. only because of the competing neo-Hitler/neo-Lincoln characters was it not, with the same caveat thst the ur-Napoleon was also snubbed (and his namesake successors, obviously). Perhaps or perhaps not for differing reasons but conceivably Wellington/etc supporters had mutually exclusively been adamant about which historic figure was Le Grande Fromage originally born amongst that cohort.
| |
| β | :Of course "Hitler's Generation" and even "Lincoln's Generation" are also geographically ''and'' socially a subset of the temporal bracketting (of those born when their figurehead was prominant, not at the time their future-figrehead was born), with connotations of their own, for good or ill according to the eye of the beholder.
| |
| β | :...So it's bad phrasing, but I can imagine why it was written. Not quite how to succinctly write it better, though, even to my own satisfsction. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.73|162.158.159.73]] 12:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Now I can't see this page when I'm logged in. I can see it fine when logged out. Error when logged in is:
| |
| β |
| |
| β | <nowiki>MediaWiki internal error.
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Original exception: [Yv7GONoeKp91oLam6dPHcQAAAFY] 2022-08-18 23:07:36: Fatal exception of type "MWException"
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Exception caught inside exception handler.
| |
| β |
| |
| β | Set $wgShowExceptionDetails = true; at the bottom of LocalSettings.php to show detailed debugging information.
| |
| β | </nowiki>
| |
| β | Any ideas what could be causing this?? --[[User:Orion205|Orion205]] ([[User talk:Orion205|talk]]) 23:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
| |
