Difference between revisions of "Talk:2041: Frontiers"
(→"Around 95% of the oceans haven't been explored and mapped by humans.": new section) |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | What about Missouri though? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == "Around 95% of the oceans haven't been explored and mapped by humans." == | |
| − | + | ||
| + | Is there a source for this fact? It isn't even clear what the sentence is saying. Is this a fraction of the surface of the ocean? The ocean floor? The water column? What counts as "exploring" a part? Do you just have to see it from a distance, or go there yourself, and if so, how close do you have to get? Will a ship that's twice as wide explore twice as much ocean per mile? That doesn't seem reasonable. How will we know when we are done exploring the ocean? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, if that does refer to some actual figure, it's probably out of date by now anyway. [[User:EebstertheGreat|EebstertheGreat]] ([[User talk:EebstertheGreat|talk]]) 06:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:15, 7 March 2024
What about Missouri though?
"Around 95% of the oceans haven't been explored and mapped by humans."[edit]
Is there a source for this fact? It isn't even clear what the sentence is saying. Is this a fraction of the surface of the ocean? The ocean floor? The water column? What counts as "exploring" a part? Do you just have to see it from a distance, or go there yourself, and if so, how close do you have to get? Will a ship that's twice as wide explore twice as much ocean per mile? That doesn't seem reasonable. How will we know when we are done exploring the ocean?
Also, if that does refer to some actual figure, it's probably out of date by now anyway. EebstertheGreat (talk) 06:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
