| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | Is the category [[:Category:Comics featuring real people]] applicable here? It does seem to feature some comics where real people are only mentioned... Others with real people are not in that category... --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 12:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | | Is the category [[:Category:Comics featuring real people]] applicable here? It does seem to feature some comics where real people are only mentioned... Others with real people are not in that category... --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 12:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
| | :Added to the category. Makes sense to me. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.107|172.69.33.107]] 18:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | | :Added to the category. Makes sense to me. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.107|172.69.33.107]] 18:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
| − | ::Yes if a real person is named it belongs in that category. But there will of course be comics where this has not been spotted. Well noted! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ;"... but he ''curries'' on..."?? ==
| + | == "... but he ''curries'' on..."?? == |
| | + | |
| | The explanation includes the sentence "Ponytail doesn't believe him but he ''curries'' on...". | | The explanation includes the sentence "Ponytail doesn't believe him but he ''curries'' on...". |
| | + | |
| | I don't see a reason for the use of "curries" vs. the normal "carries", except that the explanation writer is adding an additional (unnecessary) pun. I'd suggest changing it back to the idiomatic "carries on". -- 16:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | | I don't see a reason for the use of "curries" vs. the normal "carries", except that the explanation writer is adding an additional (unnecessary) pun. I'd suggest changing it back to the idiomatic "carries on". -- 16:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
| − | Ummm, ... for you non-nerds in the audience, his use of "currying" is a deliberate software joke. Check the Wikipedia page for "currying" (software option) [[User:Cellocgw|Cellocgw]] ([[User talk:Cellocgw|talk]]) 16:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Yes it was a joke. Like in the incomplete reason etc. But I have not problem you removed it. Hope someone got a laugh first, and now it is preserved here ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | The explanation states that Cueball is implying that his school is from a state other than California, but I don't see any such implication in the comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.35|162.158.79.35]] 18:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | | The explanation states that Cueball is implying that his school is from a state other than California, but I don't see any such implication in the comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.35|162.158.79.35]] 18:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
| − | :Second panel "Our state gave..." [[User:Bugstomper|Bugstomper]] ([[User talk:Bugstomper|talk]]) 19:13, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::Yes pretty clear that California made this law, and Cueballs state made a better law! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ;The laws misunderstood?
| |
| − | First, the California law, which "gives athletes rights to their names and likeness". In reality the athletes always had rights to their names and likeness. What the new law allows is for the athletes to license their names/likeness to commercial companies, and receive renumeration for that. Thus, Cueball's summary of the law, even though not incorrect, if taken literally can be misunderstood that the athletes had no rights to their names before.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Then the "other state"'s law, which "gives players rights to use the names and images of ANY California athlete". This is not a real law, so there is a considerable latitude in its possible meaning. This law's summary is intentionally constructed in such a way as to mimic the California's law summary, but that doesn't mean its meaning should be taken literally. I believe that it is *unlikely* that Randall intended this law to be taken literally, mainly because such law would likely be unconstitutional (if one state recognizes name/likeness as a property, then another state may not violate those property rights). What I think the law actually means is that that state's athletes can use *as their own* the name/likeness of another player, provided that they licensed that name/likeness legally. Thus, it's a pun on the word "use": usually when companies "use athlete's name/likeness" means they produce ads featuring those athletes; whereas in the Cueball's state to "use athlete's name/likeness" would mean to adopt it as your own.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Such interpretation is confirmed in the last panel: "one player got the rights to his name, ...". Thus, the first player had to obtain those rights, presumably paying to the original name owner. However, once that player adopted the name as his own - he is now free to license the name to the next player on his team, and so on (presumably at a huge discount). {{unsigned ip|172.69.22.44}} (Also please do not add sections to the discussion...)
| |
| − | :Of course it is a joke law. But Cueball presents it to the others as a real law from his state. And no Randall did not intend this to be believed as a real law, and the explanation already mentions the flaw with other state vs own state and that it is either a mistake or Cueball just running along to setup for his currying joke! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Just a nit that, IMO, "carrying" in bball isn't about passing or not (that would be traveling) but its other name is "palming" Oddly, WikiP has it as "[carrying] occurs when
| |
| − | when the dribbling player continues to dribble after allowing the ball to come to rest in one or both hands." which makes it sound like double dribble. I guess they're all related somehow, I guess I thought of carrying/palming as holding the ball up, while dribbing, for an improper period of time. I guess it's com-pli-cated - see #5,6 & 7 https://www.sdhsaa.com/Portals/0/PDFs/Officials/Basketball/MostMisunderstoodBasketballRules.pdf [[User:Afbach|Afbach]] ([[User talk:Afbach|talk]])
| |
| − |
| |
| − | There have been a ton of changes since I made my fist version of the explanation where I did change some parts and added several new things... So I'm pretty happy to see that no one really changed the idea behind my explanation, but just added and improved. Cool :-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
| |
