Editing Talk:2285: Recurring Nightmare

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 23: Line 23:
 
Is it worth mentioning in the list of (non-nudity) precautions that wearing a facemask isn't actually a very good protective measure. Masks (especially everyday/ad-hoc types such as could have been seen worn by people outdoors in those in those halcyon days when anybody ''did'' still go outdoors) are practically useless in protecting the wearer from others. They'd still touch surfaces infected by non-wearers and then easily transfer the infection the next time they adjust/remove it or otherwise touch other vulnerable bits of their face. They can wash their hands before removing it, in their home 'airlock', but if the mask is breath-moistened it could still be holding the virus and retransfer onto the clean hands again.  OTOH, if someone is infected then their mask does more to safeguard others. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.202|162.158.34.202]] 17:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 
Is it worth mentioning in the list of (non-nudity) precautions that wearing a facemask isn't actually a very good protective measure. Masks (especially everyday/ad-hoc types such as could have been seen worn by people outdoors in those in those halcyon days when anybody ''did'' still go outdoors) are practically useless in protecting the wearer from others. They'd still touch surfaces infected by non-wearers and then easily transfer the infection the next time they adjust/remove it or otherwise touch other vulnerable bits of their face. They can wash their hands before removing it, in their home 'airlock', but if the mask is breath-moistened it could still be holding the virus and retransfer onto the clean hands again.  OTOH, if someone is infected then their mask does more to safeguard others. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.202|162.158.34.202]] 17:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 
:In my opinion, since masks aren't even mentioned in the comic, adding this would stray too far from the objective of explaining the comic. [[User:Bischoff|Bischoff]] ([[User talk:Bischoff|talk]]) 19:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 
:In my opinion, since masks aren't even mentioned in the comic, adding this would stray too far from the objective of explaining the comic. [[User:Bischoff|Bischoff]] ([[User talk:Bischoff|talk]]) 19:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 
Speaking of adding things that go astray from the topic, I have a recurring nightmare that our dear author is actually as autistic as I am and coronavirus has broken his brain to the point that he cannot think of any jokes on any other topic.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 20:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 
: Seems to me contributors here have a worse obsession with the pandemic than Randall, since I've had no traction in pointing out that [[2278: Scientific Briefing]] isn't about COVID-19. --[[User:Pi one|Pi one]] ([[User talk:Pi one|talk]]) 22:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 
:: [[2283: Exa-Exabyte]] is a better example for being doubtful, as it was well into the pandemic quarantine by that time.  Your example *could* be more about Trump's reaction to the current situation than the situation itself, but it still requires the situation to make sense. 
 
::: The same comic could have appeared at any time and would have worked perfectly well. --[[User:Pi one|Pi one]] ([[User talk:Pi one|talk]]) 19:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 
::it is about 'why should I care about the future?' and is a sarcastic comment about how world leaders have reacted to covid/SARS2.
 
::: It is a sarcastic comment on a general behavior whose most prominent recent example is the bungled handling of COVID-19.  It avoids restricting itself to that one case. --[[User:Pi one|Pi one]] ([[User talk:Pi one|talk]]) 13:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)