Editing Talk:2407: Depth and Breadth
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
where did the quality go [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.24|172.69.34.24]] 19:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC) | where did the quality go [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.24|172.69.34.24]] 19:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
: I noticed this too. As discussed at [[User:DgbrtBOT]] there are two sizes of each comic. The default (smaller) size of [https://xkcd.com/2407/ 2407] looks much worse than the original, which you can find at [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/depth_and_breadth_2x.png https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/depth_and_breadth_2x.png] I suggest we use the larger version for this comic. [[User:Alchemistmatt|Alchemistmatt]] ([[User talk:Alchemistmatt|talk]]) 20:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC) | : I noticed this too. As discussed at [[User:DgbrtBOT]] there are two sizes of each comic. The default (smaller) size of [https://xkcd.com/2407/ 2407] looks much worse than the original, which you can find at [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/depth_and_breadth_2x.png https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/depth_and_breadth_2x.png] I suggest we use the larger version for this comic. [[User:Alchemistmatt|Alchemistmatt]] ([[User talk:Alchemistmatt|talk]]) 20:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
β | + | ||
It would appear that the first version of the picture of this day's cartoon presents artifacts due to an unusual export method. | It would appear that the first version of the picture of this day's cartoon presents artifacts due to an unusual export method. | ||
The image seems to have been exported using the 'nearest neighbor' resampling method, which would explain the jaggy edges. | The image seems to have been exported using the 'nearest neighbor' resampling method, which would explain the jaggy edges. |