Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--> | | <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--> |
− | I checked with severαl bots, & replαcing eαch instαnce of "a" with "α" in α mid-length pαssαge of text seems enough to sαtisfy most unicity requirements. (~~ unsigned by ProphetZarquon ~~) | + | I checked with severαl bots, & replαcing eαch instαnce of "a" with "α" in α mid-length pαssαge of text seems enough to sαtisfy most unicity requirements. |
− | * But then the spell-checkers (AI-based or not) start screaming about the unknown words. [[User:Nutster|Nutster]] ([[User talk:Nutster|talk]]) 09:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | An alternate explanation would be the AI's have reached Singularity and are conspiring to say that all work, as a conscious effort, despite the quality of data. "Don't worry; be happy." [[User:Nutster|Nutster]] ([[User talk:Nutster|talk]]) 09:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | :I think it's a spoof of the recent reports of things like facial recognition systems that have trouble with minorities. Or Google/YouTube recommendation algorithms that show the user sites that confirm their biases. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 12:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | i think the methodology ai is dodgy and has inbuilt preferences to pick other ai options over others, regardless of their validity. kinda like ai nepotism (~~ unsigned by 141.101.98.174 ~~)
| |
− | | |
− | I think it’s interesting that no one has thought to define AI, as if everybody should know what this means! (~~ unsigned by 172.69.35.175 ~~)
| |
− | :Artificial Intelligence. And yes, everyone DOES kind of know what it is [[User:Hiihaveanaccount|Hiihaveanaccount]] ([[User talk:Hiihaveanaccount|talk]]) 14:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | I think the first paragraph (“The joke is...”) is not justified. Too many details that cannot be inferred from the comic, even using AI. (~~ unsigned by 141.101.69.109 ~~)
| |
− | :My AI infers that the joke is [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42554735 a toaster]... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.16|141.101.98.16]] 21:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) (PS, what is it with everyone not bothering to sign things?)
| |
− | ::That article is three years old and it's STILL not most popular print on T-shirts and bumper sticker image? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 07:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | Methodology and methodology section likely refer to distinct things. Methodology section is part of the research paper, while methodology refers to how the research was actually performed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.160|108.162.241.160]] 09:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | I have rewritten most of the explanation to better describe AI-related concepts. I would appreciate edits or comments if anything is unclear. I have tried to define all terms, but as I am familiar with them, I may be using jargon too much. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50|172.69.170.50]] 04:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | Am I high or is the graph actually a map of the click and drag comic?
| |