Talk:2610: Assigning Numbers

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 05:52, 23 April 2022 by MrCandela (talk | contribs) (Made a comment I hope I did it right)
Jump to: navigation, search

Does this imply that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem isn't correct? And that it's method is bunk? Please help! -Seer 162.158.107.230 02:08, 23 April 2022 (UTC) I believe the intention is that the theorem is not part of the set of bad data science, just that they share this one feature.

Isn't the Gödel number for a theorem calculated by multiplying the numbers of the components together, so complicated theorems would have larger numbers? If so, the current explanation that this isn't a good way to judge fields is wrong. I'm not too sure though. MrCandela (talk) 05:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)