Editing Talk:34: Flowers

Instructions for photoshop editing is quite irrelevant here, I think. The comic itself is just a drawing of flowers, and hardly needs much explanation (if any). –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 18:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
:Correct. I'm working on this comic because you did not;)--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
::Shit, shit, shit... as Randall would say, but finally I could upload my edit. It's still not complete.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 00:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
::As I remember it, I removed the "explanation" that was, which wasn't popular. So I just let it be... ––[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
:::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
-:Hi Frankie, you did remove the incomplete tag. We still have to review pages like this. But your enhancements are welcome!--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
-Uhh, the title text is just an explanation, it isn't a reference to anything... You guys really try to squeeze stuff out of nothing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33|141.101.98.33]] 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
-:I dont see how the title text could be a reference to anything, maybe because of the two words "this is" ?... I'm really not convinced. I would be okay if the sentence began with "This is *not*". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.124|173.245.49.124]] 23:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
-::Agreed and removed. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
-The red flowers kind of look like trillium erectum. Just saying. [[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 16:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)