Editing Talk:85: Paths
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::I added the equations to the explanation. Should they be a little more in-depth? I was worried about cluttering up the page, but I'm also worried that some people would want a fuller derivation. [[User:DownGoer|DownGoer]] ([[User talk:DownGoer|talk]]) 03:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC) | ::I added the equations to the explanation. Should they be a little more in-depth? I was worried about cluttering up the page, but I'm also worried that some people would want a fuller derivation. [[User:DownGoer|DownGoer]] ([[User talk:DownGoer|talk]]) 03:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
− | Interestingly enough, if the three sides are equal in time taken (20 seconds each), the time it would take for path #2 would be 20rt2 + 20, and path three would be roughly 40, which comes out to 60, 48.28, and 40 seconds by using very simple geometry. | + | Interestingly enough, if the three sides are equal in time taken (20 seconds each), the time it would take for path #2 would be 20rt2 + 20, and path three would be roughly 40, which comes out to 60, 48.28, and 40 seconds by using very simple geometry. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |