Editing Talk:895: Teaching Physics
|
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Maybe the problem with the universe is that the actual topography of the universe is still unknown. So since nobody knows what is the shape of the universe, it makes indeed little sense to try to define a centre. If the universe turns out to be a sphere (even if it doesn't seem likely) we could define a centre.[[User:Meneldal|Meneldal]] ([[User talk:Meneldal|talk]]) 02:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)meneldal | Maybe the problem with the universe is that the actual topography of the universe is still unknown. So since nobody knows what is the shape of the universe, it makes indeed little sense to try to define a centre. If the universe turns out to be a sphere (even if it doesn't seem likely) we could define a centre.[[User:Meneldal|Meneldal]] ([[User talk:Meneldal|talk]]) 02:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)meneldal | ||
| β | |||
| β | |||
An analogy doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be helpful. It is meant to be a stepping stone between not understanding and full understanding, so your mind can take two smaller leaps instead of one huge one. Apologies for the poor analogy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.58|108.162.219.58]] 21:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC) | An analogy doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be helpful. It is meant to be a stepping stone between not understanding and full understanding, so your mind can take two smaller leaps instead of one huge one. Apologies for the poor analogy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.58|108.162.219.58]] 21:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
