Editing Talk:897: Elevator Inspection

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
This comic has my doubts.  If you placed the certificate in the actual elevator, it might be vandalized, stolen, or otherwise destroyed.  Of course, you could just put a photocopy of the original certificate in the elevator, but not very many pointy-haired bosses are that clever. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.217|108.162.245.217]] 03:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 
This comic has my doubts.  If you placed the certificate in the actual elevator, it might be vandalized, stolen, or otherwise destroyed.  Of course, you could just put a photocopy of the original certificate in the elevator, but not very many pointy-haired bosses are that clever. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.217|108.162.245.217]] 03:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
βˆ’
:That's why the certificate goes behind shatterproof clear plastic in a tamper-resistant frame. Casual vandals seldom carry the right kind of screwdriver. At one job, I used to hear people complain on a regular basis about expired certificates in the cars. Even with the building's management keeping up a diligent and ongoing maintenance program (be foolish not to. Who needs that kind of exposure?) an underfunded and overworked inspection bureaucracy can take their own sweet time making the rounds.  
+
:That's why the certificate goes behind shatterproof clear plastic in a tamper-resistant frame. Casual vandals seldom carry the right kind of screwdriver. At one job, I used to hear people complain on a regular basis about expired certificates in the cars. Even with a diligent and ongoing maintenance program, an underfunded and overworked inspection bureaucracy can take their own sweet time making the rounds.  
 
:Elevator manufacturers, like submarine sailors, do not like change for its own sake. They don't get very effusive about innovation, so no Moore's law need apply. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 14:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 
:Elevator manufacturers, like submarine sailors, do not like change for its own sake. They don't get very effusive about innovation, so no Moore's law need apply. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 14:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
  

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: