# Difference between revisions of "Talk:916: Unpickable"

Line 4: | Line 4: | ||

I solve the cube with corner pieces and edge pieces in separate steps, so I find 2x2s harder. I just have to do the corner steps. 04:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC){{unsigned|184.11.73.88}} | I solve the cube with corner pieces and edge pieces in separate steps, so I find 2x2s harder. I just have to do the corner steps. 04:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC){{unsigned|184.11.73.88}} | ||

+ | |||

+ | 2x2s are certainly not harder than any other Rubik's cube by ANY standard. As the corners of any Rubik's cube have the same rotational moves, you have to solve a 2x2 at some point when solving any cube. 4x4 is harder than 5x5 though, because you can rotate away the middle pieces.[[Special:Contributions/85.164.251.29|85.164.251.29]] 07:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC) |

## Revision as of 07:11, 29 August 2013

2x2 rubik's cubes are harder. Just sayin'. __Davidy__²²`[talk]` 01:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

This would likely be found in the residence of my colleague [**REDACTED**], as he has a collection of odd Rubik's Cube clones. -- 173.72.159.14 (talk) *(please sign your comments with ~~~~)*

I solve the cube with corner pieces and edge pieces in separate steps, so I find 2x2s harder. I just have to do the corner steps. 04:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC) -- 184.11.73.88 (talk) *(please sign your comments with ~~~~)*

2x2s are certainly not harder than any other Rubik's cube by ANY standard. As the corners of any Rubik's cube have the same rotational moves, you have to solve a 2x2 at some point when solving any cube. 4x4 is harder than 5x5 though, because you can rotate away the middle pieces.85.164.251.29 07:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)