Difference between revisions of "Talk:55: Useless"
Quicksilver (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
For those of you who have used Mathematica, if you replace the heart with "Indeterminate", you'll find yourself in a similar situation: essentially all functions of Indeterminate yield Indeterminate. It can be frustrating. --[[User:Quicksilver|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver|talk]]) 20:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC) | For those of you who have used Mathematica, if you replace the heart with "Indeterminate", you'll find yourself in a similar situation: essentially all functions of Indeterminate yield Indeterminate. It can be frustrating. --[[User:Quicksilver|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver|talk]]) 20:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | It is clear that the author has yet to study non-linear dynamics as this approach has already been covered in | ||
+ | Strogatz, S. H. (1988) Love affairs and differential equations. ''Math. Magazine'' '''61''',35. | ||
+ | Strogatz, S. H. (1994) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering. (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts) | ||
+ | One is forced to conclude that love is chaotic. | ||
+ | |||
+ | -Boyd [[Special:Contributions/160.5.148.8|160.5.148.8]] 07:59, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:59, 10 October 2013
There seems to me to be a philosophical monologue going on here: What is the root of love? What is the angle of love? What is the derivative of love? What is the identity of love?
Unfortunately, I don't know much about the Fourier transform, so I'm at a loss for describing it in layman's terms. Anyone wanna lend a hand?
204.16.25.236 16:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)MagnusVortex
I believe the last one is:
What is the frequency of love?
-JD 132.3.25.79 18:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
For those of you who have used Mathematica, if you replace the heart with "Indeterminate", you'll find yourself in a similar situation: essentially all functions of Indeterminate yield Indeterminate. It can be frustrating. --Quicksilver (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
It is clear that the author has yet to study non-linear dynamics as this approach has already been covered in
Strogatz, S. H. (1988) Love affairs and differential equations. Math. Magazine 61,35. Strogatz, S. H. (1994) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering. (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts)
One is forced to conclude that love is chaotic.
-Boyd 160.5.148.8 07:59, 10 October 2013 (UTC)