Editing Talk:5: Blown apart

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Also, the 70 is black, and, in a subtractive colour system, black = red+green+blue. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.85|108.162.216.85]] 19:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
Also, the 70 is black, and, in a subtractive colour system, black = red+green+blue. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.85|108.162.216.85]] 19:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 
: ... or rather black = magenta+yellow+cyan (red, green, blue are used in additive colour system), I suppose. Then again, who has magenta, yellow, cyan pens available during a boring lecture? [[User:Hagman|Hagman]] ([[User talk:Hagman|talk]]) 22:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 
: ... or rather black = magenta+yellow+cyan (red, green, blue are used in additive colour system), I suppose. Then again, who has magenta, yellow, cyan pens available during a boring lecture? [[User:Hagman|Hagman]] ([[User talk:Hagman|talk]]) 22:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
::No it is the subtractive color system that is refereed as the additive ends up white. But true about the colors, but when mixing the primary colors magenta+yellow+cyan two by two you get red, green, blue, which would then in that system also mix to black! Have added this to the explanation. So thanks to both of you. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 
 
I always read the factors and as 7, 5, and N. Then I realize N must be 2, and finally that it's literally 2. {{unsigned ip|162.158.222.94}}
 
 
I think it's worth keeping the message around that was just edited in and then out again: The bomb is PRIMED, that may be the reason why it makes PRIME numbers. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 19:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 
:Thanks for your critics but that sentence explains nothing. There is no bomb mentioned in the comic, it's an exploding package. And was it drunken, prepared, armed (obviously it was), or a mathematic variable like x' (x primed) referring to the prime symbol. You can find even more meanings of this simple word. I also don't understand why it should be ''the reason''. Bombs are often armed but they don't produce prime factors on detonation. The explanation should be no puzzle game. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 
 
"70 has other factors, including 1, 10, 14, 35, and 70, but 2, 5, and 7 are the only factors that are prime. All other factors of 70 can be formed by choosing zero, two, or three of the prime factors and multiplying them together." This is incorrect. You can not multiply zero, two, or three of the prime factors to obtain 1. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 02:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 
:Usually in math, we consider the empty product to be equal to 1 because multiplying by 1 does nothing and adding zero factors to a product does nothing as well. So in this interpretation we obtain 1 by multiply zero of the prime factors. I opt for keeping the text the way it is. --[[User:Flukx|Flukx]] 23:35 30 Nov 2022
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: