User contributions
- 18:03, 24 May 2025 (diff | hist) . . (-251) . . 36: Scientists (Undo revision 378465 by 172.68.229.136 (talk) Needlessly repeats part of the middle paragraph, plus inverts the *stereotype* of a gay man as actually being hyper-aware of their attire.)
- 22:19, 29 April 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+300) . . Talk:3082: Chess Position (I think I asked a question correctly)
- 18:06, 24 April 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+14) . . 3072: Stargazing 4 (→Transcript: Fixing some bad edit-remnants, plus significantly better descriptions (having only half remembered the image details by the time I was eventually into the editor...)) (current)
- 07:28, 17 April 2025 (diff | hist) . . (0) . . 3077: de Sitter (Capitalisation)
- 07:27, 17 April 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+4) . . 3077: de Sitter (Capitalisation in accordance with Wikipedia and convention; clarity)
- 19:25, 23 March 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+5) . . 2418: Metacarcinization (→Explanation) (current)
- 10:23, 19 March 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+7) . . 2705: Spacetime Soccer (current)
- 09:02, 10 March 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+8) . . 3059: Water Damage (→Explanation)
- 21:55, 12 February 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+2) . . ibm hc 3 (→Explanation: Consistently bad implementation of parenthises?)
- 21:53, 12 February 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+1) . . ibm hc 2 (→Explanation)
- 09:32, 4 February 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+1) . . 3046: Stromatolites (→Explanation)
- 19:06, 31 January 2025 (diff | hist) . . (-10) . . What If? chapters (Implementing Blog-cell template's "archiveOnly=" optional link parameter (and adjusting the on-site explanation link, but I don't like how narrow *all* columns now are, so maybe elsewhere..?))
- 14:41, 27 January 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+16) . . 3042: T. Rex Evolution (→Explanation)
- 14:32, 27 January 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+13) . . 3042: T. Rex Evolution (→Explanation)
- 14:25, 27 January 2025 (diff | hist) . . (+24) . . 3042: T. Rex Evolution (→Explanation)
- 09:51, 18 December 2024 (diff | hist) . . (-340) . . 3023: The Maritime Approximation (→Explanation: Duplication)
- 14:39, 12 December 2024 (diff | hist) . . (+233) . . User talk:Kynde (→For your attention, no rush...)
- 11:19, 23 June 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-162) . . 1238: Enlightenment (bit of irony in that there was an oxford comma in the explanation itself. Anyway, there is no error here. The word 'and' suffices to join the two clauses and I'm fairly sure 'they're definitely good' is dependent anyway. Don't mix preference with error.)
