Editing 2713: Data Point
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| date = December 19, 2022 | | date = December 19, 2022 | ||
| title = Data Point | | title = Data Point | ||
− | | image = | + | | image = data_point_2x.png |
| imagesize = 315x409px | | imagesize = 315x409px | ||
| noexpand = true | | noexpand = true | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | ==Explanation== | + | ==Explanation== |
− | + | {{incomplete|Created by a REALLY COOL DATA POINT. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | |
− | + | When scientific measurements are made, any conclusions are based on multiple data points observed in relation to each other. The joke being that a single data point can almost never represent what the information in all the data taken together indicate. | |
− | This is | + | This is possibly a joke about papers which only highlight particularly interesting or significant data without including the background measurements or similar mundane information necessary to fully understand or reproduce the findings. While there are [https://www.aje.com/en/arc/data-not-shown-4-reasons-omit-figure-or-table/ accepted reasons for this practice] it can be particularly annoying when trying to follow an otherwise useful procedure or comparing aspects of the results the authors did not anticipate. |
− | The title text suggests | + | The title text suggests including the remaining data in supplemental materials. |
+ | |||
+ | In this case the data point looks like a Tie Fighter flying at you from the direction of the Sun. This is so cool that the entire focus of the scientific paper should be on this figure alone, as stated in the caption, that gives a Science Power Move. (Similar to a Science Tip). | ||
+ | |||
+ | The title text mentions than in general you should always only include the best data point in the scientific paper. All other data can then be relegated to the section on supplementary materials. | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
+ | {{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | ||
− | + | Figure 2. | |
− | + | [A large graph with axis labels and a legend is shown containing a single plotted data point in the center, with small, symmetrical, vertical error bars, and a huge halo aura of brilliant light rays emanating out from it and filling the vast majority of the graph's area.] | |
− | + | Science power move: When one of your data points is really cool, devote a whole figure to it. | |
− | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||
− |