Difference between revisions of "Talk:1696: AI Research"
RAGBRAIvet (talk | contribs) m (contribution) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:I thought it might be a reference to teaching the Urban Dictionary to IBM's Watson {{unsigned ip|108.162.250.158}} | :I thought it might be a reference to teaching the Urban Dictionary to IBM's Watson {{unsigned ip|108.162.250.158}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oh gods — please don't even mention the Urban Dictionary. A classic example of a good idea gone bad because of little or no moderation.[[User:RAGBRAIvet|RAGBRAIvet]] ([[User talk:RAGBRAIvet|talk]]) 09:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:03, 21 June 2016
I'm Australian an I don't know about the "updog" Thing, just sayin' 162.158.2.139 05:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm British and I haven't heard of "updog" either. 141.101.98.18 08:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Never heard of that in the two years that I lived in England and South Wales. 141.101.93.49 09:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Saw "updoc" (same joke) on an episode of Scrubs once. 141.101.98.137 11:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Ok. Added a note about how developed AI tech. is nowadays. That one needs a citation. Also I believe a paragraph about the difference between AI and how computers generally work is called for. AI is built on neural networks to mimic the way human brains work. Computers have a more simplistic design, although it works wonders for number crunching and following programs. This contrasted with AI, which can figure out things on its own (learn) and not having to be told everything. Todor (talk) 17:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Those stupid chatbots that have existed for decades now are *not real* AI. But you could train those to respond in certain ways. It is quite possible this comic makes fun of this. It is also perceivable that an actual AI without sufficient higher-order reasoning would also easily be fooled, although by trial-and-error learning (that is characteristic for AI) it ought to *eventually* figure out that you are bullshitting it, and adjust its behaviour accordingly. Todor (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- I thought it might be a reference to teaching the Urban Dictionary to IBM's Watson 108.162.250.158 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Oh gods — please don't even mention the Urban Dictionary. A classic example of a good idea gone bad because of little or no moderation.RAGBRAIvet (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
