Difference between revisions of "Talk:3154: Physics Insight"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Is the drawing of Cueball and White hat the exact same of 3148? [[Special:Contributions/140.77.177.211|140.77.177.211]] 16:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC) divicarpe | Is the drawing of Cueball and White hat the exact same of 3148? [[Special:Contributions/140.77.177.211|140.77.177.211]] 16:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC) divicarpe | ||
| + | :No, the angle of Cueball's arms is slightly different... [[User:CalibansCreations|'''<span style="color:#ff0000;">Caliban</span>''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 18:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:20, 13 October 2025
Avrayter 9:55 am oct. 13 2025: okay, I assume you write these comments with html. can y'all please just implement the standing on the soldiers of giant joke into the first paragraph? Avrayter (talk) 13:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm reminded of science fiction like Star Trek where children learn "advanced" physics like quantum mechanics in high school. Barmar (talk) 14:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- There's something to this, tbh. To use just one example, there was a time in history when NEGATIVE NUMBERS were considered a bizarre innovation to the world of mathematics, boggling even expert mathematicians (since, how can you have -3 apples? A hole in the universe where three apples ought to be? It's quite an abstract concept when you think about it!) Yet nowadays, every high school graduate is expected to understand them intuitively and use them proficiently. I really do wonder what it's doing to us, where what was "advanced" in bygone years is considered "fundamentals" today. Our brains don't evolve THAT quickly. MeZimm (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Is the drawing of Cueball and White hat the exact same of 3148? 140.77.177.211 16:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC) divicarpe
