Difference between revisions of "Talk:512: Alternate Currency"
(proof of storage) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I predict that Bitcoin will be succeeded by this [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.114|108.162.241.114]] 01:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | I predict that Bitcoin will be succeeded by this [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.114|108.162.241.114]] 01:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm from the future. I came here to tell you that you were right, for a little while.--[[Special:Contributions/136.226.98.194|136.226.98.194]] 22:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Anyone here in 2026? What's interesting is that there are some cryptocurrencies that actually use "Proof of Storage" methods. So if you can prove you've got space for 3 zillion funny photos, you get the coin? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 00:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
This could be an even deeper jab at Bitcoin. The principle of Bitcoin is that information equals value. (Oversimplified, I know) | This could be an even deeper jab at Bitcoin. The principle of Bitcoin is that information equals value. (Oversimplified, I know) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
Now, I think Cueball says that even funnies and image macros are more valuable currency because each one has an ''inherent'' value - most are mildly entertaining. That's not a whole lot of inherent value, but at least, it's a nonzero amount. | Now, I think Cueball says that even funnies and image macros are more valuable currency because each one has an ''inherent'' value - most are mildly entertaining. That's not a whole lot of inherent value, but at least, it's a nonzero amount. | ||
[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.70|141.101.104.70]] 10:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC) | [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.70|141.101.104.70]] 10:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey! Apparently people have been selling their collections on eBay. The future has arrived!--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.157|173.245.56.157]] 06:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wouldn't the pictures just be spam ctrl-c, ctrl-ved?{{unsigned|Dontknow}} | ||
| + | :Yes, that process is generally known as "inflation". --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 12:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Randal predicted NFTs? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.232|108.162.210.232]] 00:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No matter how dumb an idea sounds, someone will take it seriously. --[[Special:Contributions/136.226.98.194|136.226.98.194]] 22:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:57, 11 February 2026
I predict that Bitcoin will be succeeded by this 108.162.241.114 01:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'm from the future. I came here to tell you that you were right, for a little while.--136.226.98.194 22:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
This could be an even deeper jab at Bitcoin. The principle of Bitcoin is that information equals value. (Oversimplified, I know)
Now, I think Cueball says that even funnies and image macros are more valuable currency because each one has an inherent value - most are mildly entertaining. That's not a whole lot of inherent value, but at least, it's a nonzero amount. 141.101.104.70 10:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey! Apparently people have been selling their collections on eBay. The future has arrived!--173.245.56.157 06:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Wouldn't the pictures just be spam ctrl-c, ctrl-ved? -- Dontknow (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Randal predicted NFTs? --108.162.210.232 00:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
No matter how dumb an idea sounds, someone will take it seriously. --136.226.98.194 22:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
