Editing 1625: Substitutions 2

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
This is the second comic in the [[:Category:Substitution series|Substitution series]] where [[Randall]] has suggested substitutions that will make reading the news more fun. But there have been several [[:Category:Substitutions|comics using substitutions]] both before and after these ones.
+
This is a sequel to [[1288: Substitutions]], but there have been several [[:Category:Substitutions|comics using substitutions]] both before and after that comic.
  
The series as of 2016:
+
In this table, [[Randall]] suggests substituting several common phrases in generic news with similar or related phrases that mean something different for comical effect. Some of the replacements are {{w|synonyms}}, some are {{w|antonyms}}, and some are plain different concepts; and, even though they would (most of the time) make a grammatically correct sentence, The resulting idea would, however, often sound absurd or bizarre.
*[[1288: Substitutions]]
 
*[[1625: Substitutions 2]]
 
*[[1679: Substitutions 3]]
 
  
In this table, [[Randall]] suggests substituting several common phrases in generic news with similar or related phrases that mean something different for comical effect. Some of the replacements are {{w|synonyms}}, some are {{w|antonyms}} and some are plain different concepts; and, even though they would (most of the time) make a grammatically correct sentence, the resulting idea would, however, often sound absurd or bizarre.
+
Some of the examples might, also, mock the fact that many news contradict the actual facts or obvious results of a situation. (e.g. "[influential person] vows to do good to the world" would be replaced with with a more usual fact "[influential person] probably won't do good to the world" - see [[#Example of sentences|example]] below with North Korean leader...)
 
 
Some of the examples might, also, mock the fact that many news contradict the actual facts or obvious results of a situation. For example, "[influential person] vows to do good to the world" would be replaced with a more usual fact "[influential person] probably won't do good to the world" - see [[#Example of sentences|example]] below with North Korean leader.
 
  
 
The title text is an example of how the closing sentence of a given article or report might sound after using the substitutions in the comic.
 
The title text is an example of how the closing sentence of a given article or report might sound after using the substitutions in the comic.
 +
:After substitutions: Within a few '''minutes''', our roads will be full of '''uncontrollably-swerving''' cars and our skies full of Amazon delivery '''dogs'''.
 
:Before substitutions: Within a few '''years''', our roads will be full of '''self-driving''' cars and our skies full of Amazon delivery '''drones'''.
 
:Before substitutions: Within a few '''years''', our roads will be full of '''self-driving''' cars and our skies full of Amazon delivery '''drones'''.
:After substitutions: Within a few '''minutes''', our roads will be full of '''uncontrollably-swerving''' cars and our skies full of Amazon delivery '''dogs'''.
 
The flying dogs could be a reference to [[1614: Kites]]. Was the first of two in a row where Amazon is mentioned in the title text (next [[1626: Judgment Day]]).
 
  
 
===Table of substitutions===
 
===Table of substitutions===
Line 34: Line 28:
 
| {{w|Debate}}
 
| {{w|Debate}}
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dance-off Dance-off]
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dance-off Dance-off]
| A 'debate' is often used between political candidates, to give the voters a chance to decide who they will vote for. One of the candidates is often called the winner of such a debate by some degree or other of consensus. Randall is indicating that they could just as well have performed a 'dance-off' where they would dance until one of them danced better than the other, as adjudged by the viewing crowd or a panel of judges. Such a dance-off is often seen in [http://gameshows.wikia.com/wiki/Family_Dance_Off TV-shows] or [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3024964/combined films] etc.
+
| A 'debate' is often used between political candidates, to give the voters a chance to decide who they will vote for. One of the candidates <!-- ''Airbenders'' (*note correct spelling*, if this was intentional and needs restoring)--> is often called the winner of such a debate by some degree or other of concensus. Randall is indicating that they could just as well have performed a 'dance-off' where they would dance until one of them danced better than the other, as adjudged by the viewing crowd or a panel of judges. Such a dance-off is often seen in [http://gameshows.wikia.com/wiki/Family_Dance_Off TV-shows] or [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3024964/combined films] etc.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Autonomous car|Self driving}}
 
| {{w|Autonomous car|Self driving}}
 
| Uncontrollably [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/swerving swerving]
 
| Uncontrollably [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/swerving swerving]
| 'Self driving' cars were also mentioned in [[1623: 2016 Conversation Guide]], just two comics before this one where it he incorrectly predicted they would become mass-market surprisingly soon ("within a few minutes", according to the title text here). Randall pokes fun with the mental image of self-driving cars running completely out of control and swerving dangerously out of their lanes. By definition, a self-driving car does turn out of an occupant's control. Self-driving cars are a [[:Category:Self-driving cars|recurring topic]] on xkcd.
+
| 'Self driving' cars were also mentioned in [[1623: 2016 Conversation Guide]] where it was stated that they would come surprisingly soon (within a few minutes according to the substitutions suggested here). But until they are safe it might be better to mention them as uncontrollably swerving cars? <!-- possibly also a reference to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrwxEX8qOxA could be put here??? -->
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Poll}}
 
| {{w|Poll}}
 
| {{w|Psychic reading}}
 
| {{w|Psychic reading}}
| A 'poll', especially regarding political issues, refers to {{w|opinion poll|opinion}} or {{w|exit poll|exit}} polls. These tend to ask a carefully selected sample (for either balance or an intended ''inbalance'', depending on the poll's neutrality) their opinions in order to extrapolate the global consensus, e.g. the future result of an {{w|election}}. This substitution is Randall's way of saying that they could just as well have used a {{w|psychic}} person to predict the result. This would likely be viewed as a mockery by the skeptic xkcd readership, with psychics having a reputation of either responding with vague guesses or providing an answer that pleases those asking the question. Randall may believe polls are like that.
+
| A 'poll', especially regarding political issues, refers to {{w|opinion poll|opinion}} or {{w|exit poll|exit}} polls. These temd to ask a carefully selected sample (for either balance or an intended ''inbalance'', depending on the poll's neutrality) their opinions in order to extrapolate the global consensus, e.g. the future result of an {{w|election}}. This substitution is Randall's way of saying that they could just as well have used a {{w|psychic}} person to predict the result. A true psychic (if that they are) would reveal an accurate result, whilst a false one (skilled at 'cold reading' an audience) would likely wish to provide the answer that pleases those asking the question (the actual purpose of some polls), or else attempt to provide their actual 'best guess' as to future outcomes in order to improve their own legend.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Candidate}}
 
| {{w|Candidate}}
 
| {{w|Airbender}}
 
| {{w|Airbender}}
| A 'candidate' usually refers to a political person who represents a certain political party in an election. He would then be that party's candidate, for instance for a presidential election. 'Airbender' refers to the show {{w|Avatar: The Last Airbender}}, where there are magical martial-artists mostly identified as waterbenders, earthbenders, firebenders and airbenders<!-- clarification: the ur-powed of energybending is more than just all four elements together in the 'normal' avatar-level panspeciality mode, implying possibility of more sub-bending classes; plus Toph's development of metalbending goes beyond hyperspecialised earthbending to an arguable fifth 'element'-class, by the time of Kuvira; thus both canon and fanon *may* admit to more, even before 965:Elements puts an xkcd-spin on it, which it doesn't hurt to allow for -->, depending upon which 'element' their abilities have power over.
+
| A 'candidate' usually refers to a political person who represents a certain political party in an election. He would then be that party's candidate, for instance for a presidential election. 'Airbender' refers to the show {{w|Avatar: The Last Airbender}}, where there are waterbenders, earthbenders, firebenders and (at this point) a single surviving airbender, the airbender in question being a pivotal character upon whose actions the future fate of world relies.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Unmanned aerial vehicle|Drone}}
 
| {{w|Unmanned aerial vehicle|Drone}}
 
| {{w|Dog}}
 
| {{w|Dog}}
| Could refer to {{w|Drone (bee)|male bees}} or {{w|Drone (sound)|drone music}}, but as used in the title text it refers to unmanned aerial vehicles. {{w|Amazon.com|Amazon}} was hoping to use small drones to deliver parcels, and Randall has referred to these before (see [[1523: Microdrones]]). In the 2010s, drones were popularized as toys and professional camera platform, but the term also became closely associated with military drones that observe (and, more recently, kill) enemy forces without risking any military personnel. Replacing this word with "dog" might make reports of drone implementations more pleasant and cute.
+
| Drones can be many things, for instance a {{w|Drone (bee)|male bee}}, but as used in the title text it reefers to unmanned aerial vehicles. {{w|Amazon.com|Amazon}} <!-- This was 'Amazone'... I've seen this erroneous spelling before, guys... not sure if it's a non-Anglophone version of Amazon or just a non-Anglophonic misconception of the spelling.  Also, now linking straight to the non-disambiguating page... --> is about to use small drones to deliver parcels, and Randall has referred to these before (see [[1523: Microdrones]]). However, until just before the recent trend of becoming popularised as a 'toy' or professional camera platform, the term became closely associated with ''military'' drones that have been used to observe (and, more recently, fire upon) enemy forces without risking any military personnel. <!-- Also possibly link to {{w|BigDog}}? -->
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Vows}} to
 
| {{w|Vows}} to
Line 58: Line 52:
 
| {{w|Fugitive#Terminology|At large}} (or {{w|At-large}})
 
| {{w|Fugitive#Terminology|At large}} (or {{w|At-large}})
 
| Very [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/large large]
 
| Very [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/large large]
| A criminal that is on the run is said to be at large (no hyphen). At-large (with hyphen) is a political designation for members of a governing body who are elected or appointed to represent the whole membership of the body, rather than a subset of that membership. Neither of these have anything to do with the physical size or "largeness" of the subject.
+
| A criminal that is on the run is said to be at large. But At-large is a political designation for members of a governing body who are elected or appointed to represent the whole membership of the body, rather than a subset of that membership.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/successfully Successfully]
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/successfully Successfully]
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/suddenly Suddenly]
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/suddenly Suddenly]
| The two words have nothing much to do with each other except that they both begin with ''su'' and they are both adverbs. This change would make entrepreneurial endeavours, military victories and record achievements sound like unintended, spontaneous surprises.
+
| The two words have nothing much to do with each other except that they both begins with ''su''.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/expand Expands]
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/expand Expands]
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/physical Physically] expands
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/physical Physically] expands
| 'Expands' can refer to a physical expansion, or inflation, but in news reports it is often used more abstractly to refer to the growth of political power, project reach, budgets, etc. It often makes little sense to physically expand these abstract things, but it can sometimes produce an amusing visual. Incidentally, if iterated, this substitution would result in an infinite string of of "physically"s prior to any "expand."
+
| 'Expands' often refers to a physical expansion, or inflation. But it is also possible to expand on an explanation, as is done for this comic. So that would become: This explanation is being physically expanded beyond all measures...
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|First degree|First }} /{{w|second degree|second }} /{{w|third degree|third-degree}}
 
| {{w|First degree|First }} /{{w|second degree|second }} /{{w|third degree|third-degree}}
| [http://da.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Friggin Friggin'] awful
+
| [http://da.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Friggin Friggin'] awful  
| First, second and third-degree can be used in many context. {{w|Burn}}s {{w|Burn#Signs_and_symptoms|range from first to fourth degree}}, where higher is worse. {{w|Murder}} charges also range in from first to third degree in the US; here first-degree murder is the worst. Regardless, all these things are "friggin' awful" to experience, ''frigging'' being a {{w|minced oath}} on ''fucking'' (see [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/frigging#English Wiktionary]). First and second degree are also used in the context of {{w|undergraduate degree}}s, which is less bad.
+
| First, second and third-degree can be used in many context. It is common to think about {{w|Burn|burns}}, which can {{w|Burn#Signs_and_symptoms|range from first to fourth degree}}, where higher is worse. Also {{w|murder}} charges can range in from first to third degree in for instance the US. Here first degree murder is the worst. But it can be used for other things, like an {{w|undergraduate degree}} or {{w|postgraduate education}} for first and second degree respectively. But the substitution fits best with murder or burn, as Friggin(g) is s "softer" swear word than for instance other more commonly used four letter words. It often replaces ''fuck''. It's original meaning was a coarse word for female masturbation (see [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/frigging#English frigging]).
 
|-
 
|-
 
| An [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unknown unknown] number
 
| An [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unknown unknown] number
 
| Like {{w|100 (number)|hundreds}}
 
| Like {{w|100 (number)|hundreds}}
| In the news, an unknown number mostly means 'probably not zero.'  It is often used in phrases like "an unknown number of assailants broke into a house in Munroe Heights," or "an unknown number of people are missing" after a calamity of some sort. "Like hundreds" does give a different flavor.
+
| This is so imprecise a statement; are we talking less than ten, more than a thousand? Maybe we could just as well have said about one hundred.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Front-runner |Front runner}}
 
| {{w|Front-runner |Front runner}}
 
| {{w|Blade Runner}}
 
| {{w|Blade Runner}}
| In American politics, a 'front-runner' is a leader in an electoral race. It can also mean the front-runner in athletic events (the namesake of the political concept). Here it is generally clear who the front-runner is, whilst the political front-runner is sometimes less clear or a more subjective viewpoint. A 'blade runner' is a person who retires (kills) rogue cyborgs in the movie Blade Runner, where {{w|Harrison Ford}} plays the lead Blade Runner.
+
| In American politics, a 'front-runner' is a leader in an electoral race. It can also mean the front-runner in athletic events (the namesake of the political concept). Here it is generally clear who the front-runner is, whilst the political front-runner is sometimes less clear or a more subjective viewpoint. A 'blade runner' is a person who retires (kills) rouge cyborgs in the movie Blade Runner, where {{w|Harrison Ford}} plays the lead Blade Runner.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Globe|Global}}
 
| {{w|Globe|Global}}
 
| {{w|Spherical}}
 
| {{w|Spherical}}
| ''Global'' typically refers to events or processes relevant to the entire planet Earth, such as {{w|global warming}} or {{w|World war|global warfare}}. Since a globe is any spherical object, this substitution makes more sense than most, although talking about "the effect of spherical warming" would probably not get {{w|Greenpeace}} into action. Reports of a spherical virus outbreak might be confusing.
+
| Global comes from globe, but means so much more today. It is often used in context such as {{w|global warming}} or {{w|World war|global warfare}}. But since a globe is spherical, this substitution makes more sense than most, although talking about ''the effect of spherical warming'' would probably not get {{w|Greenpeace}} into action.
|-  
+
|-
 
| {{w|Years}}
 
| {{w|Years}}
 
| {{w|Minute|Minutes}}
 
| {{w|Minute|Minutes}}
| Changing the units drastically from years to minutes would make many sentences silly, as there are 525,600 minutes in the typical year. Prisoners could be convicted to 10 minutes in jail, and major climate goals will be reached (or breached) in 20 minutes.
+
| It will often make a sentence lose its meaning when changing the units drastically from years to minutes (there are 525600 minutes in the usual 365 days present in a year). For instance it would be unusual that a prisoner convicted for murder would get 20 minutes in jail, rather than 20 years...
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Minute|Minutes}}
 
| {{w|Minute|Minutes}}
 
| {{w|Years}}
 
| {{w|Years}}
| Same as above but reversed: a racecar might make a trip around a track in just 7 years. One lesson at school lasted 50 years.
+
| Same as above but reversed. For instance a car might make a trip around a race track in just 7 years! One lesson at school lasted 45 years.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| No {{w|Indication| indication}}
 
| No {{w|Indication| indication}}
 
| Lots of {{w|Sign (disambiguation)|signs}}
 
| Lots of {{w|Sign (disambiguation)|signs}}
| In science, a verdict of there being "no indication" that a hypothesis is correct does not disprove that hypothesis, it merely does not support it. This is often seized upon by those trying to promote a pseudoscience, in that their chosen idea "has not been proven to be wrong." Meanwhile, hearsay and bad experimental practices are often cited as "proof". A crackpot idea may thus be unsupported by valid science (there is "no indication" of its truth) and yet its supporters insist upon there being "lots of signs" that it is true, selectively using only ambiguous results that (to them) lend credence to it being a fact. The substitution of "no indication" with "lots of signs" thus automatically converts the expected conservative and cautious stance on some disputed issue or other into the weasel-words phrasing that the issue's supporters may start using in their own propaganda.
+
| Scientifically, the fact that there is 'no indication' that a theorem is correct does not positively prove the theorem wrong, it merly does not support it (assuming there are no actual counter-indications, which is often the case with the more esoteric ideas). This is often seized upon by those trying to promote a pseudoscience, in that their chosen idea ''has not been proven to be wrong'' (and yet, conversley, "it's just a theory" is incorrectly used to refute something that has valid scientific backing). Moreover, heresay and bad experimental practices are often cited as 'proof'. A crackpot idea may thus be unsupported by valid science (there is 'no indication' of its truth) and yet its supporters insist upon there being 'lots of signs' that it is true, selectively using only ambiguous results that (to them, at least) lend credence to it being a fact. The substitution of 'no indication' with 'lots of signs' thus automatically converts the expected conservative and cautious stance on some disputed issue or other into the weasle-words phrasing that the issue's supporters may start using in their own propoganda.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/urge Urged]{{w|Self-control|restraint}} by
 
| [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/urge Urged]{{w|Self-control|restraint}} by
| {{w|Alcohol intoxication|Drunkenly}} [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/egg_on egged on]
+
| {{w|Alcohol intoxication|Drunkenly}} [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/egg_on egged on]
| If someone urges someone else to restrain themselves, then they are trying to make them exercise self-control and discourage them from starting or continuing a possibly foolish act. In this substitution we have the exact opposite, as to egg someone on to do something is actively encourage an act to happen, or continue. Urging restraint can sometimes have an encouraging effect, be it when an adolescent want to prove their courage, or when an organization loathes a government.
+
| If someone urges someone to restrain themselves, then they are trying to make them exercise self-control and discourage them from starting or continuing a possibly foolish act. In this substitution we have the exact opposite, as to egg someone on to do something is actively encourage an act to happen, or continue.
 
|-
 
|-
 
| {{w|Horsepower}}
 
| {{w|Horsepower}}
 
| {{w|Ton|Tons}} of {{w|horsemeat}}
 
| {{w|Ton|Tons}} of {{w|horsemeat}}
| Cars power is measured in horsepower (hp), a typical family car having like hundred hp, being derived from the nominal amount of power that a suitably-harnessed horse could have provided. In cars, this has nothing to do with horse meat, of any quantity, but here a mechanical (or electrical) engine is envisaged as a literally horse-powered device.
+
| Cars power is measured in horsepower (hp), a typical family car having like hundred hp, being derived from the nominal amount of power that a suitably-harnessed horse could have provided. In cars, this has nothing to do with horse meat, of any quantity, but it can make some quite funny sentences the re-envisage a mechanical (or electrical) engine as a real-horse powered device (alive or, somehow, dead and possibly even butchered).
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
===Example of sentences===
 
===Example of sentences===
 
*Here follows some real examples with links to the news/text:
 
*Here follows some real examples with links to the news/text:
**Words from the list, and the replacement words, are highlighted with '''bold''' font.
+
**Words from the list, and the replacement words are highlighted with '''bold''' font.
 
**All words are included at least once, and the list is sort of sorted after the order the words appear in the comic, but most sentences have more than one word from the list, on purpose!
 
**All words are included at least once, and the list is sort of sorted after the order the words appear in the comic, but most sentences have more than one word from the list, on purpose!
  
Line 229: Line 223:
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
  
[[Category:Substitution series]]
+
[[Category:Substitutions]]
 
[[Category:Comics sharing name|Substitutions]]
 
[[Category:Comics sharing name|Substitutions]]
[[Category:Charts]]
 
 
[[Category:Language]]
 
[[Category:Language]]
 
[[Category:Politics]]
 
[[Category:Politics]]
[[Category:Animals]]
+
[[Category:Charts]]
[[Category:Self-driving cars]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)