Editing 2034: Equations

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 6: Line 6:
 
| titletext = All electromagnetic equations: The same as all fluid dynamics equations, but with the 8 and 23 replaced with the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively.
 
| titletext = All electromagnetic equations: The same as all fluid dynamics equations, but with the 8 and 23 replaced with the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively.
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
 
+
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
This comic gives a set of mock equations. To anyone not familiar with the field in question they look pretty similar to what you might find in research papers or on the relevant Wikipedia pages. Most of the jokes are related to the symbols or "look" of most equations in the given field.
+
{| class="wikitable"
 
+
!style="width:20%"|Equation
The comic makes jokes about the fields of kinematics, number theory, fluid dynamics, quantum mechanics, chemistry, quantum gravity, gauge theory, cosmology, and physics equations. Of course, all of the equations listed are not real equations (<math>\pi-\infty</math> and H<sub>2</sub>EAT are clearly jokes and making a mockery of the given field). As always, Randall is just having a laugh.
+
!style="width:20%"|Field
 
+
!style="width:60%"|Explanation
:<math>E=K_{0}t+\frac{1}{2}\rho{}vt^2</math>
+
|-
;All {{w|kinematics}} equations
+
|<math>E = K_0t + \frac{1}{2}\rho vt^2</math>
Most kinematics equations tend to make heavy use of constants, addition, powers, and multiplication. This specific equation resembles the actual kinematics equation d = vt + 1/2at^2, but replaces a (acceleration) with v (velocity) times <math>\rho{}</math> (density) and replaces velocity with "K<sub>0</sub>", which is not a term used in kinematics.
+
|ALL KINEMATICS EQUATIONS
 
+
|Energy equals a constant K_0 multiplied by time plus half of density multiplied by speed multiplied by time squared
:<math>K_{n}=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\sum_{\pi=0}^{\infty}(n-\pi)(i+e^{\pi-\infty})</math>
+
|-
;All {{w|number theory}} equations
+
|<math>K_n = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\sum_{\pi=0}^{\infty}(n-\pi)(i-e^{\pi-\infty})</math>
Randall jokes about how number theory often involves the use of summations. The use of ''&pi;'' as an integer variable in the double summation is a joke, as ''&pi;'' is essentially always used for the well-known constant 3.14159..., not a variable. The use of ''i'' as a summation variable '''is''' common, though it can also be confused with the imaginary unit &radic;-1. The constants ''e'', ''i'', and ''&pi;'', as well as the theoretical upper bound <math>\infty</math>, often appear in number theory equations.
+
|ALL NUMBER THEORY EQUATIONS
 
+
|
:<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}\nabla\!\cdot\!\rho=\frac{8}{23}\int\!\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\subset\!\!\supset\rho\,{ds}\,{dt}\cdot{}\rho\frac{\partial}{\partial\nabla}</math>
+
|-
;All {{w|fluid dynamics}} equations
+
|<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\nabla\cdot p = \frac{8}{23}
Fluid dynamics equations often involve copious integrals, especially those over closed contours as done here, which are often the main telling factors of those equations to an outsider. The time derivative and gradient operator <math>\nabla</math> are common in fluid dynamics, mostly via the Navier-Stokes equation, and the fluid density <math>\rho</math> is one of the functions of central importance. The fraction 8/23 is a comically weird choice, but various unexpected fractions do pop up in fluid dynamics. The ds and dt go with the double contour integral (s is probably distance, t is time), but the derivative with respect to <math>\nabla</math> at the end is very much not allowed.
+
\int\!\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\bigcirc\,\,
 
+
\rho\,ds\,dt\cdot \rho\frac{\partial}{\partial\nabla}
:<math>|\psi_{x,y}\rangle=A(\psi)A(|x\rangle\otimes|y\rangle)</math>
+
</math>
;All {{w|quantum mechanics}} equations
+
|ALL FLUID DYNAMIC EQUATIONS
Quantum mechanics often involves some of the foreign-looking symbols listed, including {{w|Bra–ket notation|bra-ket notation}}, the {{w|Tensor product|tensor product}}, and the Greek letter Psi for a quantum state. Specifically, the left side of the equation is a ket state labeled Psi that depends on x and y (probably positions), while the right-hand side may be an operator A that depends on the state Psi (it is very unusual to have such a dependence) acting on what looks like another copy of that operator which depends on the outer product of states labeled by x and y (again strange). A charitable interpretation could be that the second A is the eigenfunction A of the operator A. Normally this is clearly indicated by giving the operator a “hat” (^ symbol) or making the eigenfunction into a ket eigenstate, but since the equation is intentionally nonsense both A’s are left ambiguous. Also note that the bra-ket math is inconsistent here, as the left side is a ket, but the right side is just two A’s, which are either operators or functions but are definitely not kets.
+
|-
 
+
|<math>|\psi_{x,y}\rangle = A(\psi) A(|x\rangle \otimes |y\rangle)</math>
:<math>CH_4+OH+HEAT\rightarrow{}H_2O+CH_{2}+H_2EAT</math>
+
|ALL QUANTUM MECHANIC EQUATIONS
;All {{w|chemistry}} equations
+
|
Chemistry equations use formulas of chemical compounds to describe a chemical reaction. Such equations show the starting chemicals on the left side and the resulting products on the right side, as displayed. Sometimes such an equation might optionally indicate that an {{w|activation energy}} is required, for the reaction to take place in a sensible timeframe, e.g. by heating. A reaction requiring heating is usually indicated by a Greek capital letter Delta (''&Delta;'') or a specified temperature above the reaction arrow, however this comic uses the "+ HEAT" term on the left side instead. The joke is that Randall interprets "HEAT" to be another chemical, possibly the nonsensical helium-monastatide, which reacts with Hydrogen (H) to H<sub>2</sub>EAT, which is nonsensical, as heat is transferred energy here, not added matter. Regardless of this, Randall gets the {{w|stoichiometry}} of this equation correct, with the same number of all types of 'atoms' on each side of the equation.
+
|-
 
+
|<math>\mathrm{CH}_4 + \mathrm{OH} + \mathrm{HEAT} \rightarrow \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O} + \mathrm{CH}_2 + \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{EAT}</math>
:<math>SU(2)U(1)\times{}SU(U(2))</math>
+
|ALL CHEMISTRY EQUATIONS
;All {{w|quantum gravity}} equations
+
| the combustion of methane often taught and good example problem but obviously there are more chemistry problems than the combustion of methane.
Quantum gravity uses mathematical {{w|Group (mathematics)|groups}} denoted by uppercase letters, as shown. {{w|Special unitary group|SU(2)}}, {{w|Unitary group|U(1)}}, and {{w|Unitary group|U(2)}} are all well-studied groups, though 'SU(U(2))' makes no sense.  The lack of relator means this expression isn't an equation.
+
|-
 
+
|<math>SU(2)U(1) \times SU\left(U(2)\right)</math>
:[[File:All gauge theory equations.png]]
+
|ALL QUANTUM GRAVITY EQUATIONS
;All {{w|gauge theory}} equations
+
|
Gauge theory is a subset of field theory. Most gauge theory equations appear to have many strange-looking constants and variables with odd labels. However, almost none of the symbols used here are found or applicable to gauge theory.
+
|-
 
+
|<math>S_g = \frac{-1}{2\bar{\epsilon}}i\eth \hat{\big(} \zeta_0 \dotplus p_\epsilon \rho_v^{abc}\cdot \eta_0 \hat{\big)} f_a^0 a\lambda(\xi) \psi(0_a)</math><br>
:<math>H(t)+\Omega+G\!\cdot\!\Lambda...\begin{cases}...>0\mathrm{\ (Hubble\ model)}\\
+
|ALL GAUGE THEORY EQUATIONS
...=0\mathrm{\ (Flat\ sphere\ model)}\\
+
|
...<0\mathrm{\ (Bright\ dark\ matter\ model)}
+
|-
\end{cases}</math>
+
|<math>H(t) + \Omega + G \cdot \Lambda \, \dots \begin{cases} \dots > 0 & \text{(HUBBLE MODEL)} \\ \dots = 0 & \text{(FLAT SPHERE MODEL)} \\ \dots < 0 & \text{(BRIGHT DARK MATTER MODEL)} \end{cases}
;All {{w|cosmology}} equations
+
</math>
Cosmology is the science of the development and ultimate fate of the universe. The joke here may be pertaining to the different models accepted in the field of cosmology. H is the {{w|Hubble's law#Time-dependence of Hubble parameter|Hubble parameter}}, &Omega; is the universal {{w|Friedmann equations#Density parameter|density parameter}}, G is the {{w|gravitational constant}}, and &Lambda; is the {{w|cosmological constant}}.
+
|ALL COSMOLOGY EQUATIONS
 
+
|
:[[File:All truly deep physics equations.png]]
+
|-
;All truly deep {{w|physics}} equations
+
|<math>\hat H - \mu_{0} = 0</math>
The joke about the "truly deep physics equations" is that most of the universal physics equations are simple, almost exceedingly so. In general, many of these equations are types of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_law conservation law] equations, which reflect some of the basic truths of the universe. A hallmark of conservation laws is that the total amount of some physical value does not change, and so one side of the equation is zero, as shown in the example. One example is Einstein's ''E = mc²'', which shows conservation of mass-energy. Noether's theorem shows that conservation laws have a one-to-one correspondence with a symmetry of nature, making these equations truly 'deep'.
+
|ALL TRULY DEEP PHYSICS EQUATIONS
 
+
|
The title text is referencing the fact that the {{w|magnetic field|electric and magnetic fields}} are often explained to physics students using an analogy with fluid dynamics, as well as the fact that they do share some similarities (only in terms of mathematical description as three-dimensional vector fields) with fluids. The permittivity constant (represented with ''&epsilon;''<sub>0</sub>) and the permeability constant (represented with ''&mu;''<sub>0</sub>) are coefficients that relate the amount of charge required to cause a specific amount of electric flux in a vacuum and the ability of vacuum to support the formation of magnetic fields, respectively. They appear frequently in Maxwell's equations (the equations that define the electric and magnetic fields in classical mechanics), so Randall is making the joke that any surface integral with them in it automatically is an electromagnetism equation.
+
|}
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
:[Nine equations are listed, three in the top row and two in each of the next three rows. Below each equation there are labels:]
+
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
 
+
[TODO: Avoid using math markup here because the images of these equations isn't helpful in a transcript. Sigh.]
:E=K<sub>0</sub>t+1/2 &rho;vt<sup>2</sup>
+
[Nine equations are listed and labeled as followed:]
:All kinematics equations
+
<br><br>
 
+
E = K<sub>0</sub>t + 1/2 pvt<sup>2</sup><br>
:K<sub>n</sub>=&sum;<sup>&infin;</sup><sub>i=0</sub>&sum;<sup>&infin;</sup><sub>&pi;=0</sub>(n-&pi;)(i-e<sup>&pi;-&infin;</sup>) [K sub n = the summation from i = 0 to infinity of the sum from pi = 0 to infinity of (n - pi) * (i-e^(pi-infinity))]
+
ALL KINEMATICS EQUATIONS<br>
:All number theory equations
+
<br>
 +
<math>K_n = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\sum_{\pi=0}^{\infty}(n-\pi)(i-e^{\pi-\infty})</math><br>
 +
ALL NUMBER THEORY EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<math>\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\triangledown\cdot p = \frac{8}{23}
 +
\int\!\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\bigcirc\,\,
 +
\rho\,ds\,dt\cdot \rho\frac{\partial}{\partial\triangledown}
 +
</math><br>
 +
ALL FLUID DYNAMIC EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<math>|\psi_{x,y}\rangle = A(\psi) A(|x\rangle \otimes |y\rangle)</math><br>
 +
ALL QUANTUM MECHANIC EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
CH<sub>4</sub> + OH + HEAT &rarr; H<sub>2</sub>O + CH<sub>2</sub> + EAT <br>
 +
ALL CHEMISTRY EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
SU(2)U(1) &times; SU(U(2)) <br>
 +
ALL QUANTUM GRAVITY EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<math>S_g = \frac{-1}{2\epsilon}i\eth \hat{\big(} \zeta_0 \dotplus p_\epsilon \rho_v^{abc}\cdot \eta_0 \hat{\big)} f_a^0 a\lambda(\zeta) \psi(0_a)</math><br>
 +
ALL GAUGE THEORY EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<math>H(t) + \Omega + G \cdot \land \, ... \begin{cases} ... > 0 & \text{(HUBBLE MODEL)} \\ ... = 0 & \text{(FLAT SPHERE MODEL)} \\ ... < 0  & \text{(BRIGHT DARK MATTER MODEL)} \end{cases}
 +
</math><br>
 +
ALL COSMOLOGY EQUATIONS<br>
 +
<br>
 +
&#x0124; - u̧<sub>0</sub> = 0<br>
 +
ALL TRULY DEEP PHYSICS EQUATIONS
 +
<br>
  
:&#x2202;/&#x2202;t &nabla;&sdot;&rho;=8/23 (&#x222F; &rho; ds dt &sdot; &rho; &#x2202;/&#x2202;&nabla;)
 
:All fluid dynamics equations
 
 
:|&psi;<sub>x,y</sub>&#x232a;=A(&psi;)A(|x&#x232a;&#x2297;|y&#x232a;)
 
:All quantum mechanics equations
 
 
:CH<sub>4</sub>+OH+HEAT&rarr;H<sub>2</sub>O+CH<sub>2</sub>+H<sub>2</sub>EAT
 
:All chemistry equations
 
 
:SU(2)U(1)&times;SU(U(2))
 
:All quantum gravity equations
 
 
:S<sub>g</sub>=(-1)/(2&epsilon;&#x0304;) i&eth;(&#x302; &xi;<sub>0</sub> &#x2a22; p<sub>&epsilon;</sub> &rho;<sub>v</sub><sup>abc</sup>&sdot;&eta;<sub>0</sub>)&#x302; f&#x0335;<sub>a</sub><sup>0</sup> &lambda;(<span style="display:inline-block; -ms-transform:rotate(180deg); -webkit-transform:rotate(180deg); transform:rotate(180deg);">&xi;</span>) &psi;(0<sub>a</sub>)
 
:All gauge theory equations
 
 
:H(t)+&Omega;+G&sdot;&Lambda; ...
 
:[There is a brace linking the three cases together.]
 
:... > 0 (Hubble model)
 
:... = 0 (Flat sphere model)
 
:... < 0 (Bright dark matter model)
 
:All cosmology equations
 
 
:&#x0124; - u&#x0327;<sub>0</sub> = 0
 
:All truly deep physics equations
 
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
[[Category:Science]]
 
[[Category:Physics]]
 
 
[[Category:Math]]
 
[[Category:Math]]
[[Category:Chemistry]]
 
[[Category:Cosmology]]
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)