|
Please sign your posts with ~~~~
|
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| | | |
| @paultmorrison To explain the elevator pitch, have you seen the other comics involving Beret Guy? He's pretty weird. Check out [http://pastebin.com/iVhppvJm these four comics] (especially the one with the rubber sheet) {{unsigned ip|199.27.128.120}} | | @paultmorrison To explain the elevator pitch, have you seen the other comics involving Beret Guy? He's pretty weird. Check out [http://pastebin.com/iVhppvJm these four comics] (especially the one with the rubber sheet) {{unsigned ip|199.27.128.120}} |
− |
| |
− | This cartoon might be considered a precursor to XKCD 1032, in which Beret Guy turns up with a small suitcase full of money and attempts -- in his exceedingly random fashion -- to engage in what he believes to be standard business-type networking behavior. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.40|108.162.219.40]] 23:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | If someone were to actually buy a gull, does that make them gullible? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.174|199.27.128.174]] 23:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | Of course Beret Guy would use an honesty system. What if you don't put money in the jar after catching a bird? Or you steal the jar? {{unsigned ip|108.162.250.223}}
| |
− |
| |
− | -Seeing how well things just seem to go for Beret Guy, I wouldn't advise it. Who knows what the universe would do to anyone who crossed him. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.85|108.162.237.85]] 02:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | How is this missing a "real explanation"? [[User:RamenChef|RamenChef]] ([[User talk:RamenChef|talk]]) 19:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | == Incomplete explanation? ==
| |
− |
| |
− | Does this really belong in "incomplete explanations"? It seems fine to me. [[User:Sensorfire|Sensorfire]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire|talk]]) 13:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
| |
− |
| |
− | No no no! Someone needs to add, "There are no gull markets. No one buys them." I'd do it, but I don't feel like it.
| |
− | (Please dear God do not add that. The incomplete tag isn't there for nothing. If I somehow get in trouble for this, so sue me.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.47.6|172.68.47.6]] 03:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
| |