Difference between revisions of "Talk:1968: Robot Future"
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Instead of a tribute today, all I saw was a short, violent dystopian film. But this is quite an important matter, look at the video. Certantly more important... But still, can't wait for the tribute. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 13:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC) | Instead of a tribute today, all I saw was a short, violent dystopian film. But this is quite an important matter, look at the video. Certantly more important... But still, can't wait for the tribute. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 13:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | If memory serves, Hawking is cited with similar concern about AI technology, and it's potential to out think humans exponentially (not just a buzz word, but actually exponentially). However he did advocate for needs that aren't met in the immediate, not the theoretical future. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.208|108.162.216.208]] 13:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:28, 17 March 2018
Seems strange that the only "explanation" so far is a plug for a YouTube video. Can we get some text up in here? -- ProphetZarquon (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- It seems the video says it all. 162.158.255.172 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
I'm sad it was not about Stehpen today... --Kynde (talk) 00:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Instead of a tribute today, all I saw was a short, violent dystopian film. But this is quite an important matter, look at the video. Certantly more important... But still, can't wait for the tribute. Herobrine (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
If memory serves, Hawking is cited with similar concern about AI technology, and it's potential to out think humans exponentially (not just a buzz word, but actually exponentially). However he did advocate for needs that aren't met in the immediate, not the theoretical future. 108.162.216.208 13:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC)