Is the joke that all of the equations are actually wrong/malformed/meaningless but they sort of look like typical equations for that field?
- Sort of. A bit of dimensional analysis would have helped. ;-) --188.8.131.52 07:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deep physics equations
The transcript is wrong here, the last letter is not a , but a "u" with a cedilla: u̧. The math parser refuses to render it, though. 184.108.40.206 05:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like it. But I don't think that letter exists even. --220.127.116.11 07:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is this equation a sort of nod to a Theory Of Everything which unifies quantum mechanics and gravity... H-hat (a Hamiltonian, which in quantum mechanics describes the total energy of a system, and usually runs in to problems describing large systems - such as the entire universe - where gravity or spacetime curvature effects matter) *minus* u0 (the relativistic mass of the whole system at time zero ie. the big bang) gives 0 (no energy everywhere always). Since mass is energy (e=mc^2) and mass is also the sole cause of gravity the two theories cleanly collapse together when mass is zero, and figuring out how to extend the theory to other less clean points on the mass axis is obviously a job for less profound physics? I've no ideas to explain the cedilla. 18.104.22.168 08:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- It looks to me a little like a parody of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation which (in theory) describes a wavefunction for the entire Universe. Exxi (talk) 09:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)一
Is this poking fun at equation-filled blackboards in movies and cartoons?