Difference between revisions of "Talk:2755: Effect Size"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wasn't something like this actually done?)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Wow, it looks like I'm first![[Special:Contributions/162.158.146.40|162.158.146.40]] 16:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 
Wow, it looks like I'm first![[Special:Contributions/162.158.146.40|162.158.146.40]] 16:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
  
== Wasn't something like this actually done? ==
 
  
 +
;Wasn't something like this actually done?
 
Robert Sapolsky mentions an obscure paper that actually did something like this.  They did a meta-analysis of the average reported error throughout various disciplines in order of the physical size of the objects being studied (e.g., from cells to organs to etc.), and found no correlation between them.  The conclusion was that this was evidence that philosophical reductionism was flawed.  [[User:Fephisto|Fephisto]] ([[User talk:Fephisto|talk]]) 22:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 
Robert Sapolsky mentions an obscure paper that actually did something like this.  They did a meta-analysis of the average reported error throughout various disciplines in order of the physical size of the objects being studied (e.g., from cells to organs to etc.), and found no correlation between them.  The conclusion was that this was evidence that philosophical reductionism was flawed.  [[User:Fephisto|Fephisto]] ([[User talk:Fephisto|talk]]) 22:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 
: Did you manage to find it? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.57.203|172.70.57.203]] 08:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 
: Did you manage to find it? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.57.203|172.70.57.203]] 08:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:56, 28 March 2023

Wow, it looks like I'm first!162.158.146.40 16:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


Wasn't something like this actually done?

Robert Sapolsky mentions an obscure paper that actually did something like this. They did a meta-analysis of the average reported error throughout various disciplines in order of the physical size of the objects being studied (e.g., from cells to organs to etc.), and found no correlation between them. The conclusion was that this was evidence that philosophical reductionism was flawed. Fephisto (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Did you manage to find it? 172.70.57.203 08:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)