Difference between revisions of "Talk:2767: Recipe Relativity"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Which observer timed the recipe at 35 minutes? The equations only make sense if the observer was moving in approximately the same inertial frame as Randall's, but I doubt such an observer could track a chef over 592 billion meters. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.142.107|172.71.142.107]] 06:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 
Which observer timed the recipe at 35 minutes? The equations only make sense if the observer was moving in approximately the same inertial frame as Randall's, but I doubt such an observer could track a chef over 592 billion meters. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.142.107|172.71.142.107]] 06:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 +
 +
I had something similar, turns out the I used the wrong pan. Using a better one helped.
 +
[[Special:Contributions/172.71.102.5|172.71.102.5]] 07:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:02, 25 April 2023


Istenlay!

Iway amway oinggay otay estartray! 172.68.174.123 02:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Just curious, does anyone know what the dimensions of the onion measure in the recipe when adjusting for contraction? 172.70.175.179 02:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Is it worth explicitly saying in the explanation that this is the correct equation for time distortion in Special Relativity? Nitpicking (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Which observer timed the recipe at 35 minutes? The equations only make sense if the observer was moving in approximately the same inertial frame as Randall's, but I doubt such an observer could track a chef over 592 billion meters. 172.71.142.107 06:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I had something similar, turns out the I used the wrong pan. Using a better one helped. 172.71.102.5 07:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)