Difference between revisions of "Talk:2864: Compact Graphs"
(x-axis values in explanantion?) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
100, '''<span style="color:#0060ff">230</span>''', hue 217 (blue, HEX 0060ff) | 100, '''<span style="color:#0060ff">230</span>''', hue 217 (blue, HEX 0060ff) | ||
| − | Does anyone | + | Does anyone find a consistent/proportional correlation between x-axis and HSV-hue? If not, it makes not much sense to mention the x-axis values in the explanation. |
| + | |||
--[[User:LaVe|LaVe]] ([[User talk:LaVe|talk]]) 07:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | --[[User:LaVe|LaVe]] ([[User talk:LaVe|talk]]) 07:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:21, 7 December 2023
Suggestion for X-axis: red - yellow - green - blue (like visible light spectral colours, but in reverse direction)
Suggestion for y-axis: 62 (red) - 159 (yellow) - 187 (blue) - 205 (green) - 230 (blue)
--172.71.246.52 21:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
If the second "graph" really is a representation of the same data as the first, there should be five points, corresponding to (approximately) {(17, 62), (36, 159), (67, 206), (88, 186), (100, 232)}. I copied the first plot to GIMP, cropped it, scaled it to 100x250, and measured the centres of the dots. :-) BunsenH (talk) 02:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
I agree with five labels. Combining these information above so far, and adding information from the Color Model HSV (also extracted with GIMP, from the large file :-)
17, 62, hue 13 (red, HEX ff3a00)
36, 159, hue 51 (yellow, HEX ffdb0f)
67, 205, hue 87 (green, HEX 8afc03)
88, 187, hue 169 (turquoise, HEX 08a387)
100, 230, hue 217 (blue, HEX 0060ff)
Does anyone find a consistent/proportional correlation between x-axis and HSV-hue? If not, it makes not much sense to mention the x-axis values in the explanation.
