Editing Talk:316: Loud Sex

It is still strange: On sexual comics we got many technical discussions and here (a sexual background is also given) we can imagine some "aberrant sexual behavior"? How that single neighbor girl should come to this? Or will that dish brake and fall onto this two people in the bed on the left? I would just say this is only a technical comic, with some sidesteps. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

:Pardon? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 20:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
::Is sex more important than science? Maybe, but while everybody knows how to perform sex, they do not understand how to do this science.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

I had interpreted the "aberrant behavior" of the other mehtioned types of reflectors as referring to the way they would focus the sound- a parabolic dish would focus sound into a parallel beam, annoying the entire hallway (but not any one person as much- compare sunlight coming through a window to the same light, routed through a magnifying glass, where the glass is the ellipsoidal dish); while a spherical dish would focus the sound right back on Cueball himself.

Also, I dobut the threshold of pain could actually be reached here, since it would be hard for the intensity of the sound focused in the neighbor's room to exceed that of the sound in Cueball's own room- and I'd be surprised if Cueball's friend produced enough sound to make her own head hurt. My guess is that the neighbor had just been startled awake.

--[[User:Someone Else 37|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37|talk]]) 22:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
:"Aberration" should be understood here as a sound equivalent of [[wikipedia:Optical aberration]]. An spheric or parabolloidal reflector wouldn't focus in one point sound from a point source. Of course, there is also a double meaning with aberrant sexual behavior.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 12:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-It is still strange: On sexual comics we got many technical discussions and here (a sexual background is also given) we can imagine some "aberrant sexual behavior"? How that single neighbor girl should come to this? Or will that dish break and fall onto this two people in the bed on the left? I would just say this is only a technical comic, with some sidesteps. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
+It is still strange: On sexual comics we got many technical discussions and here (a sexual background is also given) we can imagine some "aberrant sexual behavior"? How that single neighbor girl should come to this? Or will that dish brake and fall onto this two people in the bed on the left? I would just say this is only a technical comic, with some sidesteps. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 :Pardon? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 20:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 ::Is sex more important than science? Maybe, but while everybody knows how to perform sex, they do not understand how to do this science.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
-:::Speaking as an ardent advocate of the Philosophy of Science...yes, sex is more important. Without it, you will quickly run out of scientists. And it's also more fun. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 21:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
-::::[[Citation Needed]] on the last sentence... sigh [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 19:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
-::::: I'm firmly in the camp that there are multiple kinds of fun; There's the "wow that was amazing" fun of sex, the "oh wow" fun of watching that one hour lecture link all the concepts you were introduced to, the "i can't breathe" fun of cycling, and so on. Whils discovering in science might not be the "wow that was amazing" kind of fun, it's certainly the "EUREKA!" kind of fun. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.22.196|162.158.22.196]] 11:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 I had interpreted the "aberrant behavior" of the other mehtioned types of reflectors as referring to the way they would focus the sound- a parabolic dish would focus sound into a parallel beam, annoying the entire hallway (but not any one person as much- compare sunlight coming through a window to the same light, routed through a magnifying glass, where the glass is the ellipsoidal dish); while a spherical dish would focus the sound right back on Cueball himself.
@@ Line 13: / Line 10: @@
 --[[User:Someone Else 37|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37|talk]]) 22:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 :"Aberration" should be understood here as a sound equivalent of [[wikipedia:Optical aberration]]. An spheric or parabolloidal reflector wouldn't focus in one point sound from a point source. Of course, there is also a double meaning with aberrant sexual behavior.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 12:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
-This is a slightly annoying comic because it clearly shows cueball in the first and second panels, but it show hairy in the rest. I've added  this comic to the categorys featuring cueball and hairy.
-Cueball should be  made aware the reflector would work both ways [[Special:Contributions/198.41.230.247|198.41.230.247]] 17:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
-:He could just have the reflector stored away when he isn't getting it on. [[User:Wilh3lm|Wilh3lm]] ([[User talk:Wilh3lm|talk]]) 12:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
-::I think what IP above was saying was that ''whilst'' getting it on, the person at the other end could add and return their own choice of sounds (of any kind... 'advice', lists of sports results, music with positive/negative sensual vibes... I'm sure everyone can think up their own contributions). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.194|141.101.99.194]] 17:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)