| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | |
| | To be fair, internalising anything from a girlfriend... or a girlfriend internalising anything from a boyfriend.... could have some implications. Which wasn't intended here I'm sure. [[Special:Contributions/122.148.216.22|122.148.216.22]] 08:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC) | | To be fair, internalising anything from a girlfriend... or a girlfriend internalising anything from a boyfriend.... could have some implications. Which wasn't intended here I'm sure. [[Special:Contributions/122.148.216.22|122.148.216.22]] 08:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC) |
| | :Perhaps, but that's not a pun. That's a double entendre in the strictest sense. Anonymous 05:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | | :Perhaps, but that's not a pun. That's a double entendre in the strictest sense. Anonymous 05:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC) |
| Line 8: |
Line 9: |
| | | | |
| | Is the fact that this explanation is set as incomplete ironic? Surely the point of this post is that there IS no punchline - the victim is searching the sentence for humour that does not exist. As the alt text explains, the more literate the victim, the more they will agonize over potential wordplay which is simply not present. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.237|141.101.98.237]] 07:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | | Is the fact that this explanation is set as incomplete ironic? Surely the point of this post is that there IS no punchline - the victim is searching the sentence for humour that does not exist. As the alt text explains, the more literate the victim, the more they will agonize over potential wordplay which is simply not present. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.237|141.101.98.237]] 07:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC) |
| − |
| |
| − | Inserting "if you'll pardon the pun" into a phrase with no pun is a recurring joke on "A Bit of Fry and Laurie". {{unsigned ip|173.245.50.60}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A great comeback to this, if you're quick enough to realize it, comes courtesy of the Get Fuzzy comic strip: "No pun... implemented." [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.61|173.245.56.61]] 18:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Krkn
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Why are there two "citation needed"? I can see no way this would be true in the first case and there ''is'' a citation in the second case (P.S. did I do this right? First time using the discussion feature) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.91.217|141.101.91.217]] 14:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I think the explanation of the title text (at least the last part) isn't entirely relevant. The point is that literate people are likely to (over)correct "dammit" to "damn it" and respond to the troll, wasting time. Just like highly literate people will spend time worried about the pun they're supposedly missing. People who don't care won't waste time in either case. Making people waste time is the definition of successful trolling, so in these cases the trolling works better on literate people. A relatively uncommon regional contraction in the United States (South?) isn't really part of the issue. {{unsigned ip|108.162.226.103}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Poor Beret Guy. [[User:SilverMagpie|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie|talk]]) 23:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | When I read the title text, I at first thought that some people spell "dammit" with one m or something, because of the words "with two m's". Well, I certainly wondered how other people misspelled it. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.63|162.158.62.63]] 03:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | "Damn it"? Only one 'm'! [[User:KingPenguin|KingPenguin]] ([[User talk:KingPenguin|talk]]) 01:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I'm familiar with the "pardon the pun" misuse thing from David Walliams' and Matt Lucas' short-lived BBC comedy series "Come Fly With Me", but this comic predates that by about a year. Perhaps XKCD is an apparently (to me anyway) seldom-recognised influence on Messrs Walliams and/or Lucas? Or maybe it's just coincidence. (P.S. I think it's probably just coincidence.)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ;@Danger Kitty (who doesn't have a handy User Talk page, yet)
| |
| − | Re: [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=559:_No_Pun_Intended&diff=prev&oldid=324812 your question], it's {{template|Citation needed}} that you'd use (literally: <code><nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki></code>). There is also {{Template|Actual citation needed}}, if you ''mean'' it. I personally don't think it's actually worth it/useful to add either of those where you wanted to, but I'm happy to let you know. (In short: []s brace external links, [[]]s brace (predominantly) internal wikilinks and {{}}s brace templates... which also includes wikilink templates like {{Template|w}}. Look at page sources to check the usual formatting details for each.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.22|172.70.85.22]] 12:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)<!-- Whoops, forgot to sign! -->
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In volume 0 (the book) there is a number of clues given in red. I could not currently find a solution on explainxkcd or anywhere else on the internet.
| |
| − | I therefore support the need for an incomplete flag. {{unsigned ip|172.70.251.159|16:43, 8 March 2024}}
| |
