Editing Talk:953: 1 to 10

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
If 10 > 1 + 1, then P = 1 + 1 - |sgn(10 - 1 - 1)| = 1 + 1 - |1| = 1
 
If 10 > 1 + 1, then P = 1 + 1 - |sgn(10 - 1 - 1)| = 1 + 1 - |1| = 1
 
  
 
If 10 < 1 + 1, then P = 1 + 1 - |sgn(10 - 1 - 1)| = 1 + 1 - |-1| = 1
 
If 10 < 1 + 1, then P = 1 + 1 - |sgn(10 - 1 - 1)| = 1 + 1 - |-1| = 1
Line 15: Line 14:
 
[[Special:Contributions/93.73.186.104|93.73.186.104]] 16:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 
[[Special:Contributions/93.73.186.104|93.73.186.104]] 16:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:The absolute value is unnecessary. When is 10 ever less than 1+1?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.202|108.162.219.202]] 20:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:The absolute value is unnecessary. When is 10 ever less than 1+1?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.202|108.162.219.202]] 20:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
::In base -2. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.217|108.162.219.217]] 12:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
+
 
 
I don't think the explanation is right, I mean i don't know binary but i don't think the joke is that he's saying a 4 as in 100% [[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 00:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 
I don't think the explanation is right, I mean i don't know binary but i don't think the joke is that he's saying a 4 as in 100% [[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 00:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 
:A 4 is not 100%, but a 3/4 is always 75%. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.206|108.162.212.206]] 22:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:A 4 is not 100%, but a 3/4 is always 75%. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.206|108.162.212.206]] 22:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
:Actually, my comment was in reference to this: "Since 4 in binary is "100" (one-zero-zero) the joke is that it is 100% likely that the question is binary -- or it could simply be 4 of 10 - which means that the question has evolved into recursive ambiguity. Also, the person asking the question does not know what a 4 is since there is no 4 in binary." The problem I had with it was taken care of in a previous edit (The quote was taken from the 31 December 2013 edit.)--[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 22:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 
  
 
1.(1) is the best answer I've got [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 11:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 
1.(1) is the best answer I've got [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 11:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
  
"How likely" it is? As everyone knows, "every base is base 10", since every base number in its own numbering system is written as "10" (2 is 10 in binary, 16 is 10 in hex and so on). So that question could be in EVERY number system possible. There are an '''infinite amount of number systems''' that use the symbols 1 and 0. I suppose the probability is then 1 over an infinite number of systems, then very unlikely, so I'd say (as 0 is not in the range of possible answers) the answer is 1. Which, incidentally, is also an acceptable answer for every system. If we want instead to take into account that Megan doesn't know what a 4 is, the possibilities are only base 2, 3 and 4. So the likeliness is 1/3, which corresponds anyway to 1 in those number systems. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.31|108.162.229.31]] 14:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
+
"How likely" it is? As everyone knows, "every base is base 10", since every base number in its own numbering system is written as "10" (2 is 10 in binary, 16 is 10 in hex and so on). So that question could be in EVERY number system possible. I suppose the probability is then 1 over an infinite number of systems, then very unlikely, so I'd say (as 0 is not in the range of possible answers) the answer is 1. Which, incidentally, is also an acceptable answer for every system. If we want instead to take into account that Megan doesn't know what a 4 is, the possibilities are only base 2, 3 and 4. So the likeliness is 1/3, which corresponds anyway to 1 in those number systems. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.31|108.162.229.31]] 14:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 
 
:Naw, there's unary. In unary 1 is |, 5 is |||||, ten is ||||||||||, and so on. [[User:StillNotOriginal|S<sup>t<sup>i<sup>l<sup>l</sup></sup></sup></sup><sup>Not</sup>]][[User talk:StillNotOriginal|<sup><sub>Original</sub></sup>]]  02:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 
  
 
If we assume '''the question was auditory''' to the questioned, the way '10' was articulated is another source of information: the enquirer can pronounce '10' as ''"ten"'' or ''"one zero"''.
 
In the first case, if he said ''"ten"'', this points towards the base system being greater than/equal to 10. For example ''"ten"'' would be "10" in decimal (base 10) and "16" in hexadecimal (base 16). The word "ten" stops making sense for bases 2 through 9, which leads us to the conclusion of this case: the probability of the question being base 2 is zero, therefore the closest possible score one can give is 1.
 
In the case that "10" is pronounced ''"one zero"'': using the same logic as in the first case, the question can use any base 2 through 9. giving us a probability of 1/8, the nearest score again being 1.
 
 
 
So if the question were: "On a scale from one to one zero, how likely is this question using the decimal system?" Could be answered with full confidence {{unsigned ip|173.245.53.238}}
 
 
                                                      
 
                                                      
It seems that the best answer to this question is 1.11111... because it approaches 10 in binary, and is very low in almost any other number system. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.169}}
+
It seems that the best answer to this question is 1.11111... because it approaches 10 in binary, and is very low in almost any other number system.
 
 
I removed the claim that 11 could be interpreted as a (hex) 'B' grade. The grade isn't given as '11', but as '11/100', which would be 'B/64' in hex. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 13:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: